| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,14 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Debaters may not contest an assumption in the resolution. |
|
2 |
+A. Debaters may not contest multiple assumptions in the resolution. |
|
3 |
+A. All offense proving the resolution true or false must impact to a single standard that is necessary and sufficient for both debaters. |
|
4 |
+A. If the neg reads a necessary but insufficient burden, then they must concede the AC contention. |
|
5 |
+A. The aff must explicitly specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a delineated text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: |
|
6 |
+1/ Clarify how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether post-fiat offense or pre-fiat offense matters and which comes first. |
|
7 |
+2/ Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, such as whether or not the aff comes before theory. |
|
8 |
+3/ Clarify how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. |
|
9 |
+A. Must disclose text of PICs 30 min prior to the round if the aff is disclosed. |
|
10 |
+A. The negative must fiat the same actor as the affirmative. |
|
11 |
+A. If the negative reads an alternative or counterplan, they must have a carded solvency advocate that says why colleges and universities should defend the CP. |
|
12 |
+A. Debaters may not read a K alt that fiats a mindset shift |
|
13 |
+A. The negative must specify what forms of speech they restrict |
|
14 |
+A. The negative must defend a unique ethical framework from the aff. To clarify you cannot straight ref. |