Changes for page Strake Jesuit Li Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Debaters may not contest an assumption in the resolution. 2 - 3 -A. The aff must explicitly specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a delineated text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: 4 - 5 -1/ Clarify how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether post-fiat offense or pre-fiat offense matters and which comes first. 6 - 7 -2/ Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, such as whether or not the aff comes before theory. 8 - 9 -3/ Clarify how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. 10 - 11 -A. Must disclose text of PICs 30 min prior to the round if the aff is disclosed. 12 - 13 -A. The negative must fiat the same actor as the affirmative. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-23 19:56:06.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -23 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Strake Jesuit Li Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All