Changes for page Strake Jesuit Li Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[23]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-23 19:56:05. 6071 +2017-01-23 19:56:05.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,13 @@ 1 +A. Debaters may not contest an assumption in the resolution. 2 + 3 +A. The aff must explicitly specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a delineated text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: 4 + 5 +1/ Clarify how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether post-fiat offense or pre-fiat offense matters and which comes first. 6 + 7 +2/ Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, such as whether or not the aff comes before theory. 8 + 9 +3/ Clarify how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. 10 + 11 +A. Must disclose text of PICs 30 min prior to the round if the aff is disclosed. 12 + 13 +A. The negative must fiat the same actor as the affirmative. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-23 19:56:06.663 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +23 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit Li Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All