Changes for page Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,0 @@ 1 -The aff is just the myth of the free market—remove barriers and a “market place of ideas” will just magically show up. That fails to account for systemic oppression and marginalization of minorities. 2 -Sean McElwee 13 (researcher and writer based in New York. His work has been featured on Policyshop, Salon, The Atlantic and The Rolling Stone.). “The Case for Censoring Hate Speech”. Huffington Post, 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-mcelwee/hate-speech-online_b_3620270.html RC 3 -It’s interesting to note how closely this idea resembles free market fundamentalism: simply get 4 -AND 5 -groups looking to bring their pet issue to the attention of Facebook’s censors.” 6 -Autonomy is not why we value free speech, rather it is only instrumentally valuable to promote good discourse, which autonomy ruins. 7 -Owen M. Fiss 86 (Sterling Professor at Yale Law School). “Free Speech and Social Structure”. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository, 1986. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2211andcontext=fss_papers RC 8 -From this perspective, the protection of CBS's autonomy through the no-content- 9 -AND 10 -one book or to include one course necessarily entails the exclusion of another. 11 -Don’t view this as free speech vs. censorship. Regulations can be used to ultimately enhance free speech. Not all voices are equal in the status quo—this prevents us from hearing all perspectives. 12 -Robert Amdur 99 reviews Owen M. Fiss, “The Irony of Free Speech”. Review by: Robert Amdur, the University of Chicago Press, 1999. RC 13 -As an alternative, Fiss suggests that we should see regulations on speech 14 -AND 15 -of ‘‘racists, pornographers, and the rich’’ (p. 17). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-28 21:10:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -On Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -On Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -18 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan-Feb DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -UH
- Caselist.RoundClass[18]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-28 21:10:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -On Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -On Tabroom - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -UH
- Caselist.CitesClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +The aff is just the myth of the free market—remove barriers and a “market place of ideas” will just magically show up. That fails to account for systemic oppression and marginalization of minorities. 2 +Sean McElwee 13 (researcher and writer based in New York. His work has been featured on Policyshop, Salon, The Atlantic and The Rolling Stone.). “The Case for Censoring Hate Speech”. Huffington Post, 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-mcelwee/hate-speech-online_b_3620270.html RC 3 +It’s interesting to note how closely this idea resembles free market fundamentalism: simply get 4 +AND 5 +groups looking to bring their pet issue to the attention of Facebook’s censors.” 6 +Autonomy is not why we value free speech, rather it is only instrumentally valuable to promote good discourse, which autonomy ruins. 7 +Owen M. Fiss 86 (Sterling Professor at Yale Law School). “Free Speech and Social Structure”. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository, 1986. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2211andcontext=fss_papers RC 8 +From this perspective, the protection of CBS's autonomy through the no-content- 9 +AND 10 +one book or to include one course necessarily entails the exclusion of another. 11 +Don’t view this as free speech vs. censorship. Regulations can be used to ultimately enhance free speech. Not all voices are equal in the status quo—this prevents us from hearing all perspectives. 12 +Robert Amdur 99 reviews Owen M. Fiss, “The Irony of Free Speech”. Review by: Robert Amdur, the University of Chicago Press, 1999. RC 13 +As an alternative, Fiss suggests that we should see regulations on speech 14 +AND 15 +of ‘‘racists, pornographers, and the rich’’ (p. 17). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-06 17:29:44.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +s - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +a - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +da - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +uofh
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +8 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-06 17:29:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +s - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +a - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +uofh