Changes for page Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation: If the AFF argues that you drop the arg on theory and revaluate the aff under the interpretation, they must have their spikes on top of case. 2 - 3 -Plan Flaw: you say United States, not USFG- a landmass cannot implement them 4 - 5 -Interp: All theory spikes must be read at the top of the AC 6 - 7 -Interpretation. The affirmative cannot limit qualified immunity for only one specific instance of police acting badly, and defend the implementation of “the Ninth Circuit's decision on Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act's applicability to arrest situations in Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco”. 8 - 9 -Interpretation: The Aff must defend that legislative branches of the United States limit qualified immunity – they may not defend courts do it - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 13:54:00.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -f - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -f - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -f