Changes for page Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation: The aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: 2 -1) Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not. 3 -2) Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard next for a normative ethical theory. 4 -3) Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, and whether or not the aff comes before theory. 5 -4) Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 19:03:47.0 - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Strake Jesuit Herrera Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Greenhill