Changes for page Strake Jesuit Cook Neg

Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40

From version < 93.1 >
edited by Richard Cook
on 2016/12/18 16:46
To version < 115.1 >
edited by Richard Cook
on 2017/01/16 18:00
< >
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[28]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,52 @@
1 +I value morality since the resolution is normative. Every agent has a practical identity that is the source of value.
2 +Christine M. Korsgaard 92, professor of Philosophy at Harvard University. “The Sources of Normativity”, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values
3 +Those who think that the human mind is internally luminous and transparent to itself think
4 +AND
5 +identity, your nature; your obligations spring from what that identity forbids.
6 +The content of normative claims has to be contained within themselves—the nature of obligation is what gives us the ability to deduct what obligations we have.
7 +David Velleman 05 (Professor of Philosophy at New York University). “A Brief Introduction to Kantian Ethics”. 2005.
8 +Kant reasoned that if moral requirements don't derive their force from any external authority,
9 +AND
10 +that a requirement would carry authority simply by virtue of requiring that thing.
11 +Thus, the standard is consistency in the rational will.
12 +Prefer it independently:
13 +1. Absent a rational will, actions become unintelligible since the intent determines the action.
14 +Christine Korsgaard 14 (Professor at Harvard University) “How to be an Aristotelian Kantian Constitutivist.” 2014
15 + “First of all, no one thinks a wholly “external performance,”
16 +AND
17 +to at least intend to transmit the sandwich from my possession to yours.”
18 +3. Anything being good commits us to valuing it unconditionally.
19 +Christine M. Korsgaard 06 ( Professor at Harvard) “Morality and the Logic of Caring: A Comment on Harry Frankfurt”. Pg. 7 RC
20 +“If practical reasons are public, however, it must be possible for us
21 +AND
22 +reasons, then it turns out to be something like Kant’s moral law.”
23 +Also means that only my framework gives reason for action and thus guide agents to act in certain ways.
24 +Contention
25 +I advocate that public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. I’ll defend consequentialist impacts, but they’re not relevant under my framework since I just need to need to show that the maxim of the aff is consistent with the rational will.
26 +First,
27 +Second, there is a distinction between right and virtue. Right refers to external freedom, i.e. your ability to not be coerced, whereas virtue refers to a more internal freedom, i.e. you being internally motivated to make an ethical choice. Restricting free speech prevents being from being able to truly act on ethical choices.
28 +Helga Varden 10 (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech”. Springer, 22 May 2010. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.10072F978-90-481-8999-1_4 RC
29 +The first upshot of this conception of right is that anything that concerns morality as
30 +AND
31 +to both internal and external use of choice, it cannot be enforced.
32 +Third, it’s impossible for words to violate someone’s external freedom since it is up to the listener to believe them or not.
33 +Helga Varden 2 (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech”. Springer, 22 May 2010. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.10072F978-90-481-8999-1_4 RC
34 +This distinction between internal and external use of choice and freedom explains why Kant maintains
35 +AND
36 +cannot be seen as involving wrongdoing from the point of view of right.
37 +Moreover, simply saying something immoral or reprehensible is different from coercion via threats.
38 +Helga Varden 3 (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech”. Springer, 22 May 2010. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.10072F978-90-481-8999-1_4 RC
39 +Second, it is important to distinguish threats of coercion from merely immoral speech.
40 +AND
41 +me. Hence, threats are not considered mere speech on this view.
42 +Underview
43 +Silencing bigots only re-entrenches their position and galvanizes their opposition to social justice movements
44 +Levinovitz 16 Alan Levinovitz, assistant professor of religion at James Madison University, “How Trigger Warnings Silence Religious Students,” The Atlantic, August 30, 2016, http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/silencing-religious-students-on-campus/497951/
45 + There is no doubt that in America, the perspective of white, heterosexual
46 +AND
47 +deeply held beliefs. It would be a shame to execute him again.
48 +Allowing for freedom of discussion solves better for issues of hate speech.
49 +ACLU Hate Speech On Campus, https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus
50 +Where racist, sexist and homophobic speech is concerned, the ACLU believes that more
51 +AND
52 +, possibly change them, and forge solidarity against the forces of intolerance.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2016-12-18 16:51:20.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Tom Evnen, Patrick Graham
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Westwood
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +30
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - AC - Kant
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake RR
Caselist.CitesClass[29]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@
1 +Cyberbullying is protected by the first amendment.
2 +Aaron Short 14 (journalist for NY Post). “Cyberbullies Get First Amendment Protection”. NY Post, July 1, 2014. http://nypost.com/2014/07/01/cyberbullies-get-first-amendment-protection-from-court/ RC
3 +Bullies hiding behind computer screens now have the First Amendment to protect them. The
4 +AND
5 +to post an insult should end where it affects a child’s mental state.”
6 +Cyberbullying ruins lives—it destroys a student’s ability to participate in school, causes self harm, and further abuse later in life.
7 +ETCB 16. “A Surprising Long-term Effect of Cyberbullying”. End To Cyber Bullying, 2016. http://www.endcyberbullying.org/a-surprising-long-term-effect-of-cyberbullying/
8 +If someone repeatedly tells the victim online that he or she is worthless, useless
9 +AND
10 +of the abuse upon the psyche of the victim are anything but impermanent.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 05:14:16.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Adam Brown
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Kempner
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +31
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +1
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - Cyberbullying DA
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +UH
Caselist.CitesClass[30]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,69 @@
1 +The standard is rejecting structural oppression.
2 +The nature of governments necessitates pragmatic policy.
3 +Martin Rhonheimer. “The Political Ethos of Constitutional Democracy and the Place of Natural Law in Public Reason: Rawls's "Political Liberalism" Revisited” http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1364andcontext=ajj
4 +“It is a fundamental feature of political philosophy to be part of practical philosophy
5 +AND
6 +and its inherent logic of specifically political justification constitute "public reason." “
7 +This means that a) you reject abstract ethical theories—at the end of the day, no one cares whether they willed a contradiction or not, but rather the government concerns itself with outcomes of its actions, and b) absent of the neg explaining why they link to political philosophy, you default my framework.
8 +Governments have an obligation to reject forms of structural oppression—it prevents voices from being heard and comes first under any framework.
9 +WINTER AND LEIGHTON – D. D. Winter and Dana Leighton. “STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE SECTION INTRODUCTION”. 6/1/99 http://sites.saumag.edu/danaleighton/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2015/09/SVintro-2.pdf
10 +“Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions
11 +AND
12 +anger, and begin to think about how to reduce structural violence. “
13 +Advantage 1: Dissent
14 +The idea that the authority figures become the arbiter of acceptable speech causes a crack down on dissent and kills minority views from even being heard in the first place.
15 +Anthony L. Fisher 17 (associate editor at Reason.com, where his beats include criminal justice, civil liberties, free speech, and foreign affairs. He is also a sports and culture columnist at The Week.). “The free speech problem on campus is real. It will ultimately hurt dissidents”. Vox, Jan 2, 2017. http://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/12/13/13931524/free-speech-pen-america-campus-censorship RC
16 +It’s already happening. Just ask the Palestinian activists whose boycott campaigns against Israel have
17 +AND
18 +"safe space" from such "offensive" expressions of free speech.
19 +Communication between individuals is necessary—deeming some words as unworthy undermines certain backgrounds and identities which hinders students’ ability to create meaningful dialogue.
20 +Anthony L. Fisher 2 (associate editor at Reason.com, where his beats include criminal justice, civil liberties, free speech, and foreign affairs. He is also a sports and culture columnist at The Week.). “The free speech problem on campus is real. It will ultimately hurt dissidents”. Vox, Jan 2, 2017. http://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/12/13/13931524/free-speech-pen-america-campus-censorship RC
21 +The authors express the need — “in an increasingly multicultural nation” — to
22 +AND
23 +to some — but in today’s campus climate, it’s an important intervention.
24 +Bans on things like hate speech are hopelessly short sighted—it just treats the symptom of the problem in exchange for feel-good politics.
25 +Anthony L. Fisher 3 (associate editor at Reason.com, where his beats include criminal justice, civil liberties, free speech, and foreign affairs. He is also a sports and culture columnist at The Week.). “The free speech problem on campus is real. It will ultimately hurt dissidents”. Vox, Jan 2, 2017. http://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/12/13/13931524/free-speech-pen-america-campus-censorship RC
26 +The discussion of "safe spaces" has become one of the most divisive subsections
27 +AND
28 +their own speech silenced when opponents claim offense, fear, or discomfort.
29 +And, words only have as much power as you give you them. Negating just causes impact replication and people will just create new forms of hate speech.
30 +Kurtz and Oscarson ’03 - Members of National Council of Teachers of English Conference on College Composition and Communication 2k3 (Anna, Christopher, “BookTalk: Revising the Discourse of Hate,” ProQuest)
31 +However, Butler also argues that the daily, repeated use of words opens a
32 +AND
33 +might be able to create spaces for learning in which everyone feels safe.
34 +Even if free speech might not be the perfect solution, it is comparatively better to any other alternative—restrictions just make the problem worse.
35 +Kenan Malik 12 (Indian-born English writer, lecturer and broadcaster, trained in neurobiology and the history of science.). “Why Hate Speech Should Not Be Banned”. Pandemonium, 2012. https://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/why-hate-speech-should-not-be-banned/
36 +And in practice, you cannot reduce or eliminate bigotry simply by banning it.
37 +AND
38 +changes and because minorities themselves stood up to the bigotry and fought back.
39 +Advantage 2: The Liberal Bubble
40 +Silencing bigots only re-entrenches their position and galvanizes their opposition to social justice movements
41 +Levinovitz 16 Alan Levinovitz, assistant professor of religion at James Madison University, “How Trigger Warnings Silence Religious Students,” The Atlantic, August 30, 2016, http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/silencing-religious-students-on-campus/497951/
42 + There is no doubt that in America, the perspective of white, heterosexual
43 +AND
44 +deeply held beliefs. It would be a shame to execute him again.
45 +Allowing for freedom of discussion solves better for issues of hate speech.
46 +ACLU Hate Speech On Campus, https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus
47 +Where racist, sexist and homophobic speech is concerned, the ACLU believes that more
48 +AND
49 +, possibly change them, and forge solidarity against the forces of intolerance.
50 +Censorship is deconstructive and regressive and turns any criticism – blocking the freedom of speech will only guarantee the domination of current prevailing discursive practices.
51 +Ward 90 ( David V. Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy at Widener University in Pennsylvania. “Library Trends” Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Volume 39, Nos 1 and 2. Summer/Fall 1990. Pages 86-87) Second, even if the opinion some wish to censor is largely false, it may contain some portion of truth, a portion denied us if we suppress the speech which contains it. The third reason for allowing free expression is that any opinion “however true it may be, if it is not fully, frequently, and fearlessly discussed, ... will be held as a dead dogma, not a living truth” (Mill, 1951, p. 126). Merely believing the truth is not enough, Mill points out, for even a true opinion held without full and rich understanding of its justification is “a prejudice, a belief independent of, and proof against, argument-this is not the way in which truth ought to be held by a rational being. This is not knowing the truth. Truth, thus held, is but one superstition the more, accidentally clinging to the words which enunciate a truth” (p. 127). Fourth, the meaning of a doctrine held without the understanding which arises in the vigorous debate of its truth, “will be in danger of being lost, or enfeebled, and deprived of its vital effect on the character and conduct the dogma becoming a mere formal profession, inefficacious for good, but cumbering the ground, and preventing the growth of any real and heartfelt conviction, from reason or personal experience” (p. 149). Censorship, then, is undesirable according to Mill because, whether the ideas censored are true or not, the consequences of suppression are bad. Censorship is wrong because it makes it less likely that truth will be discovered or preserved, and it is wrong because it has destructive consequences for the intellectual character of those who live under it. Deontological arguments in favor of freedom of expression, and of intellectual freedom in general, are based on claims that people are entitled to freely express their thoughts, and to receive the expressions made by others, quite independently of whether the effects of that speech are desirable or not. These entitlements take the form of rights, rights to both free expression and access to the expressions of others.
52 +Advantage 3: Unions
53 +Public sector unions are rooted in the ICC, which allows states to suppress labor movement in public universities.
54 +Shaun Richman 16 (former organizing director for the American Federation of Teachers). “How ‘Friedrichs’ Could Actually Unleash Unions from Decades of Free Speech Restrictions”. In These Times, Jan. 22, 2016. http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/18796/friedrichs-v-california-teachers-association-free-speech-strikes RC
55 +As the spring semester starts up at the City University of New York, union
56 +AND
57 +tool for reversing many anti-union measures that are on the books.
58 +Even if you are skeptical of unions in general, in this instance, they are key; the government is their employer and also passes laws with regard to labor laws, so unions are the teachers’ only avenue to create collective change.
59 +Every interaction a public teacher has with the university is political, especially unions.
60 +Shaun Richman 2 (former organizing director for the American Federation of Teachers). “How ‘Friedrichs’ Could Actually Unleash Unions from Decades of Free Speech Restrictions”. In These Times, Jan. 22, 2016. http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/18796/friedrichs-v-california-teachers-association-free-speech-strikes RC
61 +So, in order to overturn this long-settled precedent the parties behind Friedrichs
62 +AND
63 +. I’d also suggest that they begin drawing up some new picket signs.
64 +Advantage 4: Backlash
65 +And, further pushing for political correctness spurs more alt right recruitment and creates divisiveness.
66 +Robby Soave 16 (associate editor at Reason.com. He enjoys writing about college news, education policy, criminal justice reform, and television. He is also a columnist for The Daily Beast and has penned articles for the New York Post, CNN, USA Today, Newsweek, The Orange County Register, and The Detroit News. Forbes named him to the 2016 "30 Under 30" list in the category of law and policy). “Trump Won Because Leftist Political Correctness Inspired a Terrifying Backlash”. Reason, Nov. 9, 2016. http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/09/trump-won-because-leftist-political-corr RC
67 +Trump won because of a cultural issue that flies under the radar and remains stubbornly
68 +AND
69 +according to his supporters, is that he isn't afraid to speak his.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 05:21:02.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Kyle Diamond
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Klein
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +32
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - AC - Five Years
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +UH
Caselist.CitesClass[31]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,26 @@
1 +A. Interpretation: the aff must defend the implementation of public colleges and universities not restricting free speech.
2 +Resolved reflects policy passage before a legislative body. Parcher 01
3 +(Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html)
4 +(1) Pardon me if I turn to a source besides Bill. American
5 +AND
6 +or 'no' - which, of course, are answers to a question.
7 +And, restrict is defined as to:
8 +Google dictionary, “restrict”, https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2andion=1andespv=2andie=UTF-8andq=restrictandoq=restrictandaqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.3011j0j7
9 +deprive (someone or something) of freedom of movement or action
10 +B. Violation:
11 +1. Real World Education-
12 +90 of policymaking is deciding on implementation.
13 +Elmore 80
14 +Prof. Public Affairs at University of Washington, 1980 PolySci Quarterly 79-80, p. 605
15 +The emergence of implementation as a subject for policy analysis coincides closely with the discovery
16 +AND
17 +10 percent, leaving the remaining 90 percent in the realm of implementation.
18 +Real-world is an independent voter and outweighs fairness and education.
19 +Strait and Wallace 7
20 +L. Paul Strait and Brett Wallace, GMU and GWU, DRG 07 george Mason University and George Washington University, Debater’s Research Guide, 2007"The Scope of Negative Fiat and the Logic of Decision Making" http://groups.wfu.edu/debate/MiscSites/DRGArticles/2007/The20Scope20of20Negative20Fiat20and20the20Logic20of20Decision20Making.pdf mgt
21 +More to the point, debate certainly helps teach a lot of skills, yet
22 +AND
23 +are not grounded in the kind of logic actually used to make decisions.
24 +That also means I control the internal link to advocacy skills—being forced to defend the merits of a concrete political action
25 +2. ground.
26 +limits
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-13 16:13:53.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Rodrigo Paramo, Morven Sharp
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Lynbrook
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +34
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +3
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - Implementation
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +HW RR
Caselist.CitesClass[32]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,30 @@
1 +The aff’s reliance on the constitution as the basis for liberty is incoherent as it ignores the constitutions roots in its own suspension and basis for coercion.
2 +Colin Christensen (Emory and Henry College). “Constitutional Regulation, Exception and Anomie: How states of exception inspire functional and moral anomie within the American constitutional system”. No Date. https://www.google.com/url?sa=tandrct=jandq=andesrc=sandsource=webandcd=2andcad=rjaanduact=8andved=0ahUKEwiwocK1iqzRAhVO4mMKHUvhDJ8QFgghMAEandurl=https3A2F2Fwpsa.research.pdx.edu2Fpapers2Fdocs2FConstitutional2520Regulation2C2520Exception2520and2520Anomie_Christensen_WPSA.docxandusg=AFQjCNFg0Vo9zVgeaWFS66jYW0WoxdMi2Qandsig2=S22hmphS4T3B2-J_SlVVfA RC
3 +Within the American constitutional system, it is axiomatic that a “constitutional right implies
4 +AND
5 +of exerting coercive power over both the government and the individual citizen alike.
6 +It empirically proven that the constitution has molded by the state serve it own interest—courts set precedent to further establish the free market.
7 +Owen M. Fiss 86 (Sterling Professor at Yale Law School). “Free Speech and Social Structure”. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository, 1986. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2211andcontext=fss_papers RC
8 +These cases presented the Court with extremely difficult issues, perhaps the most difficult of
9 +AND
10 +democracy. And they seemed to do so in a rather systematic way.
11 +They assume that politics can control the law, that the we can actually control the actions of the sovereign. This fiction ignores that the sovereign controls it self with the power to create a state of exception clearing the way for genocide.
12 +Anthony Downey 02. “Zones of Indistinction: Giorgio Agamben’s ‘Bare Life’ and the Politics of Aesthetics”. 2002. RC
13 +“The ongoing politicisation of life today demands that a series of decisions be made
14 +AND
15 +committed there and whatever its denomination and specific topography. (HS 174)”
16 +The state of exception opens up space for the worst atrocities imaginable—the state deems the human as non-human, clearing the way for genocide.
17 +Jenny Edkins 2000 (Department of International Politics, University of Wales). “Sovereign Power, Zones of Indistinction, and the Camp”. 2000. RC
18 +The camp is exemplary as a location of a zone of indistinction. Although in
19 +AND
20 +exception: the ex- clusion of both the sacred and the profane.
21 +The alt is to “prefer not to” is a means of escaping the dependency of the law. It is not that we try to solve it through the use of another law or right, but rather we exert ourselves as independent of the law all together. This is the inoperativity of the law.
22 +Jessica Whyte 09 (Senior Lecturer in Cultural and Social Analysis at Western Sydney University, Australia. She has published widely on theories of sovereignty and biopolitics, critical legal theory, critiques of human rights and contemporary continental philosophy. Her current research focuses on the politics of human rights and humanitarianism, and she is working on a book project on human rights and neoliberalism.). “‘I Would Prefer Not To’: Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby and the Potentiality of the Law”. Springer Science and Business, 2009. RC
23 +What is the power of Bartleby’s phrase—‘I would prefer not to’—that
24 +AND
25 +a potentiality that is, most importantly, the potentiality of the law.
26 +And, to “prefer not to” is a way of opening up space in the law by refusing to give an affirmation or negation of the law. We refuse to re-inscribe the narrative that the law can help us.
27 +Jessica Whyte 09 (Senior Lecturer in Cultural and Social Analysis at Western Sydney University, Australia. She has published widely on theories of sovereignty and biopolitics, critical legal theory, critiques of human rights and contemporary continental philosophy. Her current research focuses on the politics of human rights and humanitarianism, and she is working on a book project on human rights and neoliberalism.). “‘I Would Prefer Not To’: Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby and the Potentiality of the Law”. Springer Science and Business, 2009. RC
28 +Two key things are at stake in this attempt to assure the actuality of potentiality
29 +AND
30 +restoring it to contingency and enabling the forgotten to act on the present.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-15 05:21:00.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Sujay Singh
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Brentwood
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +35
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +4
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - Agamben K
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +HW
Caselist.CitesClass[33]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,16 @@
1 +Agency, or the setting and pursuing of ends, is inescapable.
2 +Luca Ferrero 09 (Ph.D. from Harvard University and Associate Professor at the University of Wisconsin). "Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency." (2009). Pg. 7-8 RC
3 +“The second feature that makes agency stand apart from ordinary enterprises is agencyʼ
4 +AND
5 +under agencyʼs own distinctive operation: Agency is closed under itself.”
6 +Absent of a public authority, rights violations are inevitable.
7 +Varden 10 “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” by Helga Varden Chapter from: “Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World” edited by Deirdre Golash 2010
8 +“The first important distinction between Kant and much contemporary liberal thought issues from Kant’s
9 +AND
10 +rather than as subject to anyone’s arbitrary choices.” (46-47)
11 +Thus, the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will.
12 +I contend that public colleges and universities have an obligation to restrict constitutionally protected free speech. And, according to Cornell Law, the Brandenburg v. Ohio U.S. Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech is protected by the First Amendment so long as it does not indicate an “imminent” threat.
13 +https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/395/444 But, seditious speech is never compatible with an omnilateral will and must be restricted. The intent requires the right to destroy the state, which justifies the annihilation of all rights.
14 +Varden 2 “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” by Helga Varden Chapter from
15 +AND
16 +citizens, it is a public crime (6: 331).” (52
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-15 20:56:23.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Ben Koh
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Harrison
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +36
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +5
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - Kant NC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +HW
Caselist.CitesClass[34]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +A. the neg must fiat the same actor as the aff.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-16 18:00:26.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +x
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +x
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +37
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +3
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake Jesuit Cook Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - Interps
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +x
Caselist.RoundClass[30]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +28
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2016-12-18 16:51:18.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Tom Evnen, Patrick Graham
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Westwood
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Strake RR
Caselist.RoundClass[31]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +29
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 05:14:13.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Adam Brown
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Kempner
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +1
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +UH
Caselist.RoundClass[32]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +30
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 05:20:59.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Kyle Diamond
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Klein
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +UH
Caselist.RoundClass[34]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +31
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-13 16:13:49.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Rodrigo Paramo, Morven Sharp
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Lynbrook
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +3
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +HW RR
Caselist.RoundClass[35]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +32
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-15 05:20:54.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Sujay Singh
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Brentwood
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +4
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +HW
Caselist.RoundClass[36]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +33
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-15 20:56:21.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Ben Koh
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Harrison
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +5
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +HW
Caselist.RoundClass[37]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +34
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-16 18:00:22.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +x
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +x
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +3
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +x

Schools

Aberdeen Central (SD)
Acton-Boxborough (MA)
Albany (CA)
Albuquerque Academy (NM)
Alief Taylor (TX)
American Heritage Boca Delray (FL)
American Heritage Plantation (FL)
Anderson (TX)
Annie Wright (WA)
Apple Valley (MN)
Appleton East (WI)
Arbor View (NV)
Arcadia (CA)
Archbishop Mitty (CA)
Ardrey Kell (NC)
Ashland (OR)
Athens (TX)
Bainbridge (WA)
Bakersfield (CA)
Barbers Hill (TX)
Barrington (IL)
BASIS Mesa (AZ)
BASIS Scottsdale (AZ)
BASIS Silicon (CA)
Beckman (CA)
Bellarmine (CA)
Benjamin Franklin (LA)
Benjamin N Cardozo (NY)
Bentonville (AR)
Bergen County (NJ)
Bettendorf (IA)
Bingham (UT)
Blue Valley Southwest (KS)
Brentwood (CA)
Brentwood Middle (CA)
Bridgewater-Raritan (NJ)
Bronx Science (NY)
Brophy College Prep (AZ)
Brown (KY)
Byram Hills (NY)
Byron Nelson (TX)
Cabot (AR)
Calhoun Homeschool (TX)
Cambridge Rindge (MA)
Canyon Crest (CA)
Canyon Springs (NV)
Cape Fear Academy (NC)
Carmel Valley Independent (CA)
Carpe Diem (NJ)
Cedar Park (TX)
Cedar Ridge (TX)
Centennial (ID)
Centennial (TX)
Center For Talented Youth (MD)
Cerritos (CA)
Chaminade (CA)
Chandler (AZ)
Chandler Prep (AZ)
Chaparral (AZ)
Charles E Smith (MD)
Cherokee (OK)
Christ Episcopal (LA)
Christopher Columbus (FL)
Cinco Ranch (TX)
Citrus Valley (CA)
Claremont (CA)
Clark (NV)
Clark (TX)
Clear Brook (TX)
Clements (TX)
Clovis North (CA)
College Prep (CA)
Collegiate (NY)
Colleyville Heritage (TX)
Concord Carlisle (MA)
Concordia Lutheran (TX)
Connally (TX)
Coral Glades (FL)
Coral Science (NV)
Coral Springs (FL)
Coppell (TX)
Copper Hills (UT)
Corona Del Sol (AZ)
Crandall (TX)
Crossroads (CA)
Cupertino (CA)
Cy-Fair (TX)
Cypress Bay (FL)
Cypress Falls (TX)
Cypress Lakes (TX)
Cypress Ridge (TX)
Cypress Springs (TX)
Cypress Woods (TX)
Dallastown (PA)
Davis (CA)
Delbarton (NJ)
Derby (KS)
Des Moines Roosevelt (IA)
Desert Vista (AZ)
Diamond Bar (CA)
Dobson (AZ)
Dougherty Valley (CA)
Dowling Catholic (IA)
Dripping Springs (TX)
Dulles (TX)
duPont Manual (KY)
Dwyer (FL)
Eagle (ID)
Eastside Catholic (WA)
Edgemont (NY)
Edina (MN)
Edmond North (OK)
Edmond Santa Fe (OK)
El Cerrito (CA)
Elkins (TX)
Enloe (NC)
Episcopal (TX)
Evanston (IL)
Evergreen Valley (CA)
Ferris (TX)
Flintridge Sacred Heart (CA)
Flower Mound (TX)
Fordham Prep (NY)
Fort Lauderdale (FL)
Fort Walton Beach (FL)
Freehold Township (NJ)
Fremont (NE)
Frontier (MO)
Gabrielino (CA)
Garland (TX)
George Ranch (TX)
Georgetown Day (DC)
Gig Harbor (WA)
Gilmour (OH)
Glenbrook South (IL)
Gonzaga Prep (WA)
Grand Junction (CO)
Grapevine (TX)
Green Valley (NV)
Greenhill (TX)
Guyer (TX)
Hamilton (AZ)
Hamilton (MT)
Harker (CA)
Harmony (TX)
Harrison (NY)
Harvard Westlake (CA)
Hawken (OH)
Head Royce (CA)
Hebron (TX)
Heights (MD)
Hendrick Hudson (NY)
Henry Grady (GA)
Highland (UT)
Highland (ID)
Hockaday (TX)
Holy Cross (LA)
Homewood Flossmoor (IL)
Hopkins (MN)
Houston Homeschool (TX)
Hunter College (NY)
Hutchinson (KS)
Immaculate Heart (CA)
Independent (All)
Interlake (WA)
Isidore Newman (LA)
Jack C Hays (TX)
James Bowie (TX)
Jefferson City (MO)
Jersey Village (TX)
John Marshall (CA)
Juan Diego (UT)
Jupiter (FL)
Kapaun Mount Carmel (KS)
Kamiak (WA)
Katy Taylor (TX)
Keller (TX)
Kempner (TX)
Kent Denver (CO)
King (FL)
Kingwood (TX)
Kinkaid (TX)
Klein (TX)
Klein Oak (TX)
Kudos College (CA)
La Canada (CA)
La Costa Canyon (CA)
La Jolla (CA)
La Reina (CA)
Lafayette (MO)
Lake Highland (FL)
Lake Travis (TX)
Lakeville North (MN)
Lakeville South (MN)
Lamar (TX)
LAMP (AL)
Law Magnet (TX)
Langham Creek (TX)
Lansing (KS)
LaSalle College (PA)
Lawrence Free State (KS)
Layton (UT)
Leland (CA)
Leucadia Independent (CA)
Lexington (MA)
Liberty Christian (TX)
Lincoln (OR)
Lincoln (NE)
Lincoln East (NE)
Lindale (TX)
Livingston (NJ)
Logan (UT)
Lone Peak (UT)
Los Altos (CA)
Los Osos (CA)
Lovejoy (TX)
Loyola (CA)
Loyola Blakefield (MA)
Lynbrook (CA)
Maeser Prep (UT)
Mannford (OK)
Marcus (TX)
Marlborough (CA)
McClintock (AZ)
McDowell (PA)
McNeil (TX)
Meadows (NV)
Memorial (TX)
Millard North (NE)
Millard South (NE)
Millard West (NE)
Millburn (NJ)
Milpitas (CA)
Miramonte (CA)
Mission San Jose (CA)
Monsignor Kelly (TX)
Monta Vista (CA)
Montclair Kimberley (NJ)
Montgomery (TX)
Monticello (NY)
Montville Township (NJ)
Morris Hills (NJ)
Mountain Brook (AL)
Mountain Pointe (AZ)
Mountain View (CA)
Mountain View (AZ)
Murphy Middle (TX)
NCSSM (NC)
New Orleans Jesuit (LA)
New Trier (IL)
Newark Science (NJ)
Newburgh Free Academy (NY)
Newport (WA)
North Allegheny (PA)
North Crowley (TX)
North Hollywood (CA)
Northland Christian (TX)
Northwood (CA)
Notre Dame (CA)
Nueva (CA)
Oak Hall (FL)
Oakwood (CA)
Okoboji (IA)
Oxbridge (FL)
Oxford (CA)
Pacific Ridge (CA)
Palm Beach Gardens (FL)
Palo Alto Independent (CA)
Palos Verdes Peninsula (CA)
Park Crossing (AL)
Peak to Peak (CO)
Pembroke Pines (FL)
Pennsbury (PA)
Phillips Academy Andover (MA)
Phoenix Country Day (AZ)
Pine Crest (FL)
Pingry (NJ)
Pittsburgh Central Catholic (PA)
Plano East (TX)
Polytechnic (CA)
Presentation (CA)
Princeton (NJ)
Prosper (TX)
Quarry Lane (CA)
Raisbeck-Aviation (WA)
Rancho Bernardo (CA)
Randolph (NJ)
Reagan (TX)
Richardson (TX)
Ridge (NJ)
Ridge Point (TX)
Riverside (SC)
Robert Vela (TX)
Rosemount (MN)
Roseville (MN)
Round Rock (TX)
Rowland Hall (UT)
Royse City (TX)
Ruston (LA)
Sacred Heart (MA)
Sacred Heart (MS)
Sage Hill (CA)
Sage Ridge (NV)
Salado (TX)
Salpointe Catholic (AZ)
Sammamish (WA)
San Dieguito (CA)
San Marino (CA)
SandHoke (NC)
Santa Monica (CA)
Sarasota (FL)
Saratoga (CA)
Scarsdale (NY)
Servite (CA)
Seven Lakes (TX)
Shawnee Mission East (KS)
Shawnee Mission Northwest (KS)
Shawnee Mission South (KS)
Shawnee Mission West (KS)
Sky View (UT)
Skyline (UT)
Smithson Valley (TX)
Southlake Carroll (TX)
Sprague (OR)
St Agnes (TX)
St Andrews (MS)
St Francis (CA)
St James (AL)
St Johns (TX)
St Louis Park (MN)
St Margarets (CA)
St Marys Hall (TX)
St Thomas (MN)
St Thomas (TX)
Stephen F Austin (TX)
Stoneman Douglas (FL)
Stony Point (TX)
Strake Jesuit (TX)
Stratford (TX)
Stratford Independent (CA)
Stuyvesant (NY)
Success Academy (NY)
Sunnyslope (AZ)
Sunset (OR)
Syosset (NY)
Tahoma (WA)
Talley (AZ)
Texas Academy of Math and Science (TX)
Thomas Jefferson (VA)
Thompkins (TX)
Timber Creek (FL)
Timothy Christian (NJ)
Tom C Clark (TX)
Tompkins (TX)
Torrey Pines (CA)
Travis (TX)
Trinity (KY)
Trinity Prep (FL)
Trinity Valley (TX)
Truman (PA)
Turlock (CA)
Union (OK)
Unionville (PA)
University High (CA)
University School (OH)
University (FL)
Upper Arlington (OH)
Upper Dublin (PA)
Valley (IA)
Valor Christian (CO)
Vashon (WA)
Ventura (CA)
Veritas Prep (AZ)
Vestavia Hills (AL)
Vincentian (PA)
Walla Walla (WA)
Walt Whitman (MD)
Warren (TX)
Wenatchee (WA)
West (UT)
West Ranch (CA)
Westford (MA)
Westlake (TX)
Westview (OR)
Westwood (TX)
Whitefish Bay (WI)
Whitney (CA)
Wilson (DC)
Winston Churchill (TX)
Winter Springs (FL)
Woodlands (TX)
Woodlands College Park (TX)
Wren (SC)
Yucca Valley (CA)