| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,10 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation: “Not restrict” simply implies negative action in which you don’t put a limit on something: thus, the affirmative can only defend stopping the use of current speech codes. They cannot defend amending some sort of definition. |
|
2 |
+Google Dictionary defines “not” as https://www.google.com/search?q=not+definitionandoq=not+definitionandaqs=chrome.0.0l6.2170j0j7andsourceid=chromeandie=UTF-8 “used with an auxiliary verb or “be” to form the negative.” |
|
3 |
+https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instantandrlz=1C5CHFA_enUS730US731andion=1andespv=2andie=UTF-8#q=restrictand* |
|
4 |
+put a limit on; keep under control. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Violation: |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Net Benefits: |
|
9 |
+1. Limits |
|
10 |
+2. Jurisdiction |