Changes for page Strake Jesuit Chen Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[62]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-03-16 01:42:09. 6251 +2017-03-16 01:42:09.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[121]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,13 @@ 1 +Interpretation: The affirmative must defend that the United States limit the qualified immunity of police officers by getting rid of immunity from suit. 2 +According to Letric Law, qualified immunity is 3 +http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/q063.htm, Letric Law 4 +The defense of qualified immunity protects "government officials . . . from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982). The rule of qualified immunity " `provides ample support to all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.' " Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 494-95 (1991) (quoting Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 341 (1986)). "Therefore, regardless of whether the constitutional violation occurred, the officer should prevail if the right asserted by the plaintiff was not `clearly established' or the officer could have reasonably believed that his particular conduct was lawful." Romero v. Kitsap County, 931 F.2d 624, 627 (9th Cir. 1991) (emphasis added). Furthermore, "the entitlement is an immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability; .. . it is effectively lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial." Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985). 5 + 6 +Violation: The aff defends getting rid of the right to financial compensation too- extra T at best. 7 +Standards: 8 +1. Limits 9 +2. Ground 10 +Voter is fairness. 11 +Drop debater. 12 +Competing interps. 13 +No RVI. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-16 01:42:12.139 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kim Hsun - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stony Point FB - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +62 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit Chen Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ND - T - Suit Immunity - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +UT