Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[61]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[62]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[61]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-18 16:55:59.601
	1	+2016-12-18 16:55:59.0

Caselist.CitesClass[62]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,17 @@
	1	+Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the hypothetical implementation of a government policy where the public colleges in the United States get rid of restrictions on constitutionally protected speech.
	2	+Resolved reflects policy passage before a legislative body. Parcher 01
	3	+(Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html)
	4	+(1) Pardon me if I turn to a source besides Bill. American Heritage Dictionary: Resolve: 1. To make a firm decision about. 2. To decide or express by formal vote. 3. To separate something into constituent parts See Syns at *analyze* (emphasis in orginal) 4. Find a solution to. See Syns at *Solve* (emphasis in original) 5. To dispel: resolve a doubt. - n 1. Frimness of purpose; resolution. 2. A determination or decision. (2) The very nature of the word "resolution" makes it a question. American Heritage: A course of action determined or decided on. A formal statemnt of a deciion, as by a legislature. (3) The resolution is obviously a question. Any other conclusion is utterly inconcievable. Why? Context. The debate community empowers a topic committee to write a topic for ALTERNATE side debating. The committee is not a random group of people coming together to "reserve" themselves about some issue. There is context - they are empowered by a community to do something. In their deliberations, the topic community attempts to craft a resolution which can be ANSWERED in either direction. They focus on issues like ground and fairness because they know the resolution will serve as the basis for debate which will be resolved by determining the policy desireablility of that resolution. That's not only what they do, but it's what we REQUIRE them to do. We don't just send the topic committee somewhere to adopt their own group resolution. It's not the end point of a resolution adopted by a body - it's the prelimanary wording of a resolution sent to others to be answered or decided upon. (4) Further context: the word resolved is used to emphasis the fact that it's policy debate. Resolved comes from the adoption of resolutions by legislative bodies. A resolution is either adopted or it is not. It's a question before a legislative body. Should this statement be adopted or not. (5) The very terms 'affirmative' and 'negative' support my view. One affirms a resolution. Affirmative and negative are the equivalents of 'yes' or 'no' - which, of course, are answers to a question.
	5	+
	6	+Violation: I don't defend implementation
	7	+
	8	+Net Benefits:
	9	+1. Ground
	10	+2. Stable Advocacy
	11	+3. T Version is just defending implementation
	12	+
	13	+Voter:
	14	+Fairness.
	15	+Drop debater.
	16	+Competing interns.
	17	+No RVI.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-18 16:56:00.370

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Sullivan, Graham

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lake Highland MK

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+32

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Strake Jesuit Chen Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1 - T Implementation

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Strake RR