Changes for page Strake Jesuit Chen Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-03 17:28:01. 8391 +2017-02-03 17:28:01.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,11 @@ 1 +Interps Greenhill Doubles: 2 +Interpretation: Debaters can only advocate for drop the argument on fairness and education voters. 3 +Interpretation: Debaters cannot read interps with abuse linking to a lack of specification without checking in CX. 4 +Interp UT R4 5 +Interpretation: The negative cannot read a counter-plan that defends abolishing qualified immunity. 6 +Interp Strake RR R4- 7 +Interpretation: If the negative reads a conditional kritik alternative, they must clarify in a delineated text in the 1N what the other possible world they defend is. 8 +Interp UH R5 9 +Interpretation – If the aff clarifies this advocacy in the form of a text in the 1AC then the negative must have an explicit text in the 1NC clarifying their advocacy. 10 +Interp HW Octas 11 +Interpretation: If the negative reads a counterplan that fiats the supreme court doing the aff, they must provide a test case. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-03 17:28:02.513 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Judge - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Opponent - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +45 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit Chen Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Broken Interps List - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tournament