Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[32]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[32]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,17 +1,0 @@
1		-Here's some shells I might read
2		-1. Spec status of CP in NC itself
3		-2. Prioritize K vs T in NC itself
4		-3. NIBs Bad
5		-4. Conditional PICs bad
6		-5. PICs Bad (in spec context usually)
7		-6. Must have advocacy text
8		-7. Disclosure theory
9		-Obviously the interps will be more nuanced than this, but this is the general idea.
10		-Interp UT R4
11		-Interpretation: The negative cannot read a counter-plan that defends abolishing qualified immunity.
12		-Interp Strake RR R4-
13		-Interpretation: If the negative reads a conditional kritik alternative, they must clarify in a delineated text in the 1N what the other possible world they defend is.
14		-Interp UH R5
15		-Interpretation – If the aff clarifies this advocacy in the form of a text in the 1AC then the negative must have an explicit text in the 1NC clarifying their advocacy.
16		-Interp HW Octas
17		-Interpretation: If the negative reads a counterplan that fiats the supreme court doing the aff, they must provide a test case.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2017-01-16 17:30:37.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Judge

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Opponent

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-30

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Quads

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Strake Jesuit Chen Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1- Possible Interps List

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Tournament