| ... |
... |
@@ -1,24
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Clinton wins now but Trump can still pull this off. Silver 8/28:==== |
| 2 |
|
-(Nate, Founder and Editor in Chief of www.fivethirteight.com, a news and statistical analysis site with an emphasis on politics. Silver’s statistical models successfully predicted all 50 state results in the 2012 election and 49 of 50 in 2008. He is the man. “Election Update: It’s Too Soon For Clinton to Run Out the Clock”, http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-its-too-soon-for-clinton-to-run-out-the-clock/, last accessed August 31) |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-But Clinton shouldn’t get too … off 21 percent earlier this month. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-====Nuclear power is popular – bets polls. Riffkin 15:==== |
| 7 |
|
-Gallup, Inc., 3-30-15, "U.S. Support for Nuclear Energy at 51," Gallup, http://www.gallup.com/poll/182180/support-nuclear-energy.aspx |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-WASHINGTON, D.C. ~-~- A slim majority … took place shortly after polling in 2011. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-====Plan flips election – any loss of Obama’s popularity kills it for the dems. Needham 16:==== |
| 12 |
|
-Vicki, The Hill, 1/21, “Moody’s model gives Dem candidate advantage in 2016,” http://thehill.com/policy/finance/266668-moodys-model-gives-dem-candidate-advantage-in-2016) |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-The Democratic presidential nominee will … election, favoring the challenger party |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-====And, nuclear energy would become the key spinning factor for Republicans because of Clinton’s lack of support and Obama’s current policy – Republicans will pit nuclear power policy against Clinton regardless of her actual policy. Siciliano 1/10==== |
| 17 |
|
-John Siciliano, 1-10-2016, "The 2016 politics of nuclear energy," Washington Examiner, http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-2016-politics-of-nuclear-energy/article/2579855 |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-The presidential election may offer … said the commission has been "eeking" along. |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-====Trump win causes cascading nuclear proliferation – impact is irreversible. Feith 16.==== |
| 22 |
|
-Douglas, Hudson Institute senior fellow, “Trump, america's word, and the bomb” National Review – March 14 ~-~- www.nationalreview.com/article/432746/donald-trump-nukes-his-recklessness-would-increase-nuclear-threats |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
-The Obama-Clinton team originally promised … , the harm would probably be irreversible. |