| ... |
... |
@@ -1,9
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====The plan says united states – that’s meaningless.==== |
| 2 |
|
-**FGF 09:** Family Guardian Fellowship; nonprofit religious ministry to protect people from extortion, persecution, and exploitation; “An Investigation Into the Meaning of the Term ‘United States’”; http://famguardian.org/subjects/Taxes/ChallJurisdiction/Definitions/freemaninvestigation.htm |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-Note that the Canal Zone is not a federal State, Territory ... basically, the whole country. Such as in 215b(2) Definitions: |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-====Vote neg - a) Presumption, the aff has a burden to move away from the status quo, but the aff doesn’t do anything. This is independent of reasons to presume neg because the aff didn’t meet its burden. b) means you aren’t topical because nothing happens c) Plan vagueness ensures bad policy—bad for education—it’s a voter—precludes role of the ballot because there’s no way to know the effect that the plan would have in the real world.==== |
| 7 |
|
-**Galles 09:** (Gary, Professor of Economics at Pepperdine, “Vagueness as a Political Strategy,” March 2, http://blog.mises.org/archives/author/gary_galles/) |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-The problem with such vagueness is that any … ensures bad policy, if Americans' welfare is the criterion. |