| ... |
... |
@@ -1,19
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Courts require litigants to adhere to unique facts of cases right now.==== |
| 2 |
|
-**Baird and Jacobi 09:** Vanessa Baird, professor of political science at UC-Boulder. Tonja, professor of law at Northwestern. “HOW THE DISSENT BECOMES THE MAJORITY: USING FEDERALISM TO TRANSFORM COALITIONS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT” November 2009. Duke L.J. |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-But why do Justices need to signal for cases in the future? If the Justices ... previously unsympathetic colleagues to join them in their opinion. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-====The affirmative takes court action without a test case – wrecks court legitimacy, judges get to manipulate outcomes and create issues out of thin air.==== |
| 7 |
|
-**Epstein 98:** Lee, professor of political science and professor of law at Washington University. “The Choices Justices Make” p160-161. |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-This story suggests that a particular version of the sua sponte doctrine ... on the soul of the adversarial system. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-====Crushes due process, turns case.==== |
| 12 |
|
-**Milani 02:** Adam Milani, assistant professor at Mercer University School of Law. Michael Smith, associate professor at Mercer University School fo Law. “PLAYING GOD: A CRITICAL LOOK AT SUA SPONTE DECISIONS BY APPELLATE COURTS” Tennessee Law Review. Volume 69. 2002. SA-IB |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments ... however, provides insight into this question. |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-====Nuclear war – failure to check military, especially likely with Herr Trump.==== |
| 17 |
|
-**Kellman 89:** Barry, professor of law at DePaul University. “JUDICIAL ABDICATION OF MILITARY TORT ACCOUNTABILITY: BUT WHO IS TO GUARD THE GUARDS THEMSELVES?”” December 1989. Duke L.J. |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-In this era of thermonuclear weapons, America ... mushroom cloud of thermonuclear holocaust |