| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Courts require litigants to adhere to unique facts of cases right now.==== |
|
2 |
+**Baird and Jacobi 09:** Vanessa Baird, professor of political science at UC-Boulder. Tonja, professor of law at Northwestern. “HOW THE DISSENT BECOMES THE MAJORITY: USING FEDERALISM TO TRANSFORM COALITIONS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT” November 2009. Duke L.J. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+But why do Justices need to signal for cases in the future? If the Justices ... previously unsympathetic colleagues to join them in their opinion. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+====The affirmative takes court action without a test case – wrecks court legitimacy, judges get to manipulate outcomes and create issues out of thin air.==== |
|
7 |
+**Epstein 98:** Lee, professor of political science and professor of law at Washington University. “The Choices Justices Make” p160-161. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+This story suggests that a particular version of the sua sponte doctrine ... on the soul of the adversarial system. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====Crushes due process, turns case.==== |
|
12 |
+**Milani 02:** Adam Milani, assistant professor at Mercer University School of Law. Michael Smith, associate professor at Mercer University School fo Law. “PLAYING GOD: A CRITICAL LOOK AT SUA SPONTE DECISIONS BY APPELLATE COURTS” Tennessee Law Review. Volume 69. 2002. SA-IB |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments ... however, provides insight into this question. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Nuclear war – failure to check military, especially likely with Herr Trump.==== |
|
17 |
+**Kellman 89:** Barry, professor of law at DePaul University. “JUDICIAL ABDICATION OF MILITARY TORT ACCOUNTABILITY: BUT WHO IS TO GUARD THE GUARDS THEMSELVES?”” December 1989. Duke L.J. |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+In this era of thermonuclear weapons, America ... mushroom cloud of thermonuclear holocaust |