| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Counterplan text: We call for the entirety of the affirmative sans their use of ableistic rhetoric. Net benefits:==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+====The use of blindness discourse is problematic – it perpetuates ableism and the idea that blindness implies moral inferiority. Treiman 11:==== |
|
4 |
+Treiman 11 Shelley Tremain (University of Toronto, Social Justice Education). “Ableist language and philosophical associations.” 2011, http://www.newappsblog.com/2011/07/ableist-language-and-philosophical-associations.html |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Over the last couple of decades, … inflicting harm in this way. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====“Blind” implies being incapable of planning, being unable to comprehend information and regularly misunderstanding the motives of others. Kali 10:==== |
|
9 |
+Brilliant Mind Broken Body: Living with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, “I am not your Metaphor,” October 17, 2010, http://brilliantmindbrokenbody.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/i-am-not-your-metaphor/ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Blind - I bet you can’t … issues that have NOTHING to do with sight! |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====Your role is an educator whose job is to challenge dominant ableist mindsets, endorsing our methodology causes a spillover into our everyday lives. Beckett 13:==== |
|
14 |
+Beckett 13’- Angharad Anti-oppressive pedagogy and¶ disability: possibilities and challenges, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Serious and systemic disability discrimination …‘foot in both camps’ i.e.¶ ‘oppressed’ and ‘privileged’. |