Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[53]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[102]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[53]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-27 22:29:15.748
	1	+2016-11-27 22:29:15.0

Caselist.CitesClass[102]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,14 @@
	1	+====The affirmative’s discourse is grounded in flawed methodology—their claims to understand China’s actions are inaccurate inevitably create China as a threat. Pan 04:====
	2	+Chengzin, dept of political science and IR @ Australian National University. "The "China Threat" in American Self-Imagination: The Discursive Construction of Other as Power Politics" 2004.
	3	+
	4	+Having examined how the "China threat" … "other" is perhaps not surprising.
	5	+
	6	+====Portraying China as a threat makes war more likely – critical questioning is a prerequisite to forging the possibility of peaceful coexistence. Vote negative to reject the concept of a “China threat” and China security representations—it’s a prerequisite to discussing the aff. Pan 04:====
	7	+Chengzin, dept of political science and IR @ Australian National University. "The "China Threat" in American Self-Imagination: The Discursive Construction of Other as Power Politics" 2004.
	8	+
	9	+I have argued above that … and debating China might become possible.
	10	+
	11	+====Representations must precede policy discussion. Crawford 02:====
	12	+Neta Crawford 2,PhD MA MIT, BA Brown, Prof. of poli sci at boston univ. Argument and Change in World Politics, 2002 p. 19-21
	13	+
	14	+Coherent arguments are unlikely to … Hence framing is a meta-argument.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-27 22:29:16.972

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Fahey, Randall, Hampton

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cypress Woods LC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+53

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Semis

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+St Andrews Bhatt Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0 - Pan China Reps K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Holy Cross