Changes for page St Andrews Bhatt Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[96]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-27 22:25:51. 861 +2016-11-27 22:25:51.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[97]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +====Interpretation: If the affirmative reads a parametricized advocacy, they must have a published solvency advocate that defends the exact plantext in its entirety.==== 2 + 3 +====Violation:==== 4 + 5 +====Standards:==== 6 +1 Research burdens – 7 + 8 +2 Ground – 9 + 10 +====Theory is a voter for fairness==== 11 + 12 +====Fairness is a voter because debate is a competitive activity and requires an equal playing field to determine who did the better debating – link turns the K of the 1AC because it turns engagement. Galloway 07==== 13 +Ryan, “DINNER AND CONVERSATION AT THE ARGUMENTATIVE TABLE: RECONCEPTUALIZING DEBATE AS AN ARGUMENTATIVE DIALOGUE”, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28 (2007) 14 + 15 +Debate as a dialogue sets … dialogical benefits of topical advocacy. 16 + 17 +====Drop the debater.==== 18 + 19 +====No RVIs==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-27 22:25:51.769 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bietz, Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Holy Cross RS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +50 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Andrews Bhatt Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Solvency Advocate Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Greenhill RR