Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[6]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[6]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,19 +1,0 @@
1		-**Interpretation: If the affirmative reads a parametricized advocacy, they must have a published solvency advocate that defends the exact plantext in its entirety.**
2		-
3		-**Violation:**
4		-
5		-**Standards:**
6		-**1 Research burdens –**
7		-
8		-**2 Ground –**
9		-
10		-**Theory is a voter for fairness **
11		-
12		-**Fairness is a voter because debate is a competitive activity and requires an equal playing field to determine who did the better debating – link turns the K of the 1AC because it turns engagement. Galloway 07**
13		-Ryan, “DINNER AND CONVERSATION AT THE ARGUMENTATIVE TABLE: RECONCEPTUALIZING DEBATE AS AN ARGUMENTATIVE DIALOGUE”, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28 (2007)
14		-
15		-Debate as a dialogue sets … dialogical benefits of topical advocacy.
16		-
17		-**Drop the debater.**
18		-
19		-**No RVIs**

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-16 18:58:26.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Bietz, Melin

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Holy Cross RS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-St Andrews Bhatt Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0 - Theory - Solvency Advocate

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Greenhill RR