Changes for page St Andrews Bhatt Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 18:58:26. 7081 +2016-09-16 18:58:26.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +**Interpretation: If the affirmative reads a parametricized advocacy, they must have a published solvency advocate that defends the exact plantext in its entirety.** 2 + 3 +**Violation:** 4 + 5 +**Standards:** 6 +**1 Research burdens –** 7 + 8 +**2 Ground –** 9 + 10 +**Theory is a voter for fairness ** 11 + 12 +**Fairness is a voter because debate is a competitive activity and requires an equal playing field to determine who did the better debating – link turns the K of the 1AC because it turns engagement. Galloway 07** 13 +Ryan, “DINNER AND CONVERSATION AT THE ARGUMENTATIVE TABLE: RECONCEPTUALIZING DEBATE AS AN ARGUMENTATIVE DIALOGUE”, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28 (2007) 14 + 15 +Debate as a dialogue sets … dialogical benefits of topical advocacy. 16 + 17 +**Drop the debater.** 18 + 19 +**No RVIs** - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-16 18:58:26.871 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bietz, Melin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Holy Cross RS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Andrews Bhatt Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Theory - Solvency Advocate - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Greenhill RR