| ... |
... |
@@ -1,9
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-**The Affirmative’s Politics of Recognition is based in the axiom of “You are in Pain Therefore You Are,” offers a glimmer of humanity to the oppressed, but only in terms of their subjection. The Aff’s offer of recognition and protection comes requires the event of excessive violence that will produce the pain that constitutes the oppressed person’s subjectivity. In the process the authorized sovereign subject retains the monopoly on violence and the oppressed’s capacity for resistance is posited as criminality. Thus, the AFF’s logic reinscribes the subjugation and criminality of the very people they attempt to liberate. Tuck and Yang 14:** |
| 2 |
|
-Eve, and K.W., “R-Words: Refusing Research.” In n D. Paris and M. T. Winn (Eds.) Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223-248). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications. Pp. 228 |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-The costs of a politics of … and pained existence?” (p. 55). |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-**The academy voyeuristically consumes the pain of the other in a will to know the voices of the other in order to constitute its own researcher self. We are good academics because we can incorporate the stories of the oppressed as our own. This economy of pain necessitates endless consumption of pain narratives of oppressed groups who are then denied the power of resistance.** |
| 7 |
|
-Tuck and Yang 2014 Eve, and K.W., “R-Words: Refusing Research.” In n D. Paris and M. T. Winn (Eds.) Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223-248). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications. Pp. 228 |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Similarly, at the center of the analysis … Only speak your pain”¶ (hooks, 1990, p. 343). |