| ... |
... |
@@ -1,40
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-===Part 1 is Framing (Long)=== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-====The role of the ballot is to vote for the advocacy that best reduces oppression.==== |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-====1 – deciding on ethical theories requires an accurate conception of reality since all theories presume some facts about the world. Structures of oppression make an accurate epistemology of this reality impossible. Friere: ==== |
| 6 |
|
-Paulo, PhD in Philosophy, Educator and Author, Leading Advocate for Critical Pedagogy, Winner of the UNESCO 1986 Prize for Education for Peace. “pedagogy of the oppressed” 2005 https://libcom.org/files/FreirePedagogyoftheOppressed.pdf SA-IB |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-Reality which becomes oppressive … developpement ulterieur de ces experiences. |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-====2 – standpoint epistemology is the best starting point for moral decisions – other methods exclude some viewpoints, which makes true analysis impossible. Mills 05:==== |
| 11 |
|
-Charles Mills, "Ideal Theory" as Ideology, 2005. **brackets for ableist language** |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-The crucial common claim—whether … realities in male-dominated philosophical literature. |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-====3 – this co-opts truth testing, I say the that AFF statement is true if doing it results in less oppression. If the neg proves the AFF advocacy causes more oppression, then the statement "AFF advocacy ought to happen" is false.==== |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====4 – oppression turns their framework==== |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-====a) arbitrariness – ==== |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-====b) inclusion is an epistemological prerequisite – ==== |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-====c) any theory that condones an unequal societal order should be rejected – ==== |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
-====5 – looking toward material conditions is key for effective debate. Curry 14:==== |
| 26 |
|
-Dr. Tommy J, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, and a Ray A. Rothrock Fellow at Texas AandM University; first Black JV National Debate champion (for UMKC) and was half of the first all Black CEDA team to win the Pi Kappa Delta National Debate Tournament. "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century." 2014. SA-IB |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
-Despite the pronouncement of … ideological tendencies and politics.’ |
| 29 |
|
- |
| 30 |
|
-====6 – you should trust your intuition that oppression is bad and actions that reduce it are good – anything else makes the debate space unsafe for those who actually face oppression. ==== |
| 31 |
|
- |
| 32 |
|
-====7 – an ethically modest method of evaluation is most consistent with real world decision making. Overing et al 14:==== |
| 33 |
|
-Bob Overing (TOC finalist 2012) and Adam Bistagne (triple-major in Philosophy, Economics and Mathematics, coach for Loyola) "Ethical Modesty Part 1" Premier Debate Today August 31 2014 http://premierdebatetoday.com/2014/08/31/moral-modesty-part-1-by-bob-overing-and-adam-bistagne/ |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
-First, ethical modesty seems … less about utilitarian reasons |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
-====8 – default to an offense-defense paradigm – key to fairness. Nelson 8 ==== |
| 38 |
|
-Adam F. Nelson, J.D.1. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. 2008. |
| 39 |
|
- |
| 40 |
|
-And the truth-statement model … want to know how the various options affect us and the world we live in. |