Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[21]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[27]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[21]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-27 22:14:41.267
	1	+2016-11-27 22:14:41.0

Caselist.CitesClass[27]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,65 @@
	1	+====Modern framing of nature has descended into technological thought – the viewing of nature of a resource spills over into all other thinking and controls our moral norms. Brown 03:====
	2	+Charles, professor of philosophy at Emporia. “The Real and the Good: Phenomenology and the Possibility of an Axiological Rationality” 2003 SA-IB
	3	+
	4	+To begin to discover the possibilities … biotic web (and perhaps beyond).
	5	+
	6	+====Modern technology establishes a worldview that makes every entity a part of the standing reserve and false epistemology and science perfect technological thought. Weinberger 92:====
	7	+Jerry, professor of political science at michigan state. “Politics and the Problem of Technology: An Essary on Heidegger and the Tradition of Political Philosophy” The American Political Science Review.
	8	+
	9	+NIHILISM AND BEING For Heidegger, … between being and its domains.
	10	+
	11	+====Our attempt to manage technology and resources results in calculative thought, which is at the root cause of years of damage. McWhorter 92:====
	12	+Ladelle, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Northeast Missouri State University. “Heidegger and the Earth” 1992 SA-IB
	13	+
	14	+Thinking today must concern itself … problems, what should we do?
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who provides the best method to break down technological thought. Ecological Thoughtprint 11:====
	18	+Ecological Thoughtprint (website for educators that promote sustainability education and teach ecological epistemology) “Dualism doesn’t make sense” December 4, 2011. https://ecologicalthoughtprint.org/2011/12/04/dualism-doesnt-make-sense/
	19	+
	20	+Have you ever asked someone, … in a distant industrial land.
	21	+
	22	+====Nuclear power is inherently technological thought – the nature of the concept represents a dangerous path into human control of nature. Kokubun 13:====
	23	+Koichiro, Associate Professor @ Takasaki City University of Economics. “Philosiphy in the Atomic Age” May 30, 2013. SA-IB
	24	+
	25	+Having said that, the word … beings to overcome this power.
	26	+
	27	+====Nuclear power engages in calculative thought kills value to life – turns nature and humanity into standing reserve. McWhorter 92:====
	28	+Ladelle, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Northeast Missouri State University. “Heidegger and the Earth” 1992 SA-IB
	29	+
	30	+The danger of a managerial, … or populations to be controlled.
	31	+
	32	+====Indigenous people are viewed as resources – modern day colonialism drives nuclear testing on indigenous lands and corporations now consider native’ land theirs. Kamps 01:====
	33	+Kevin, Nuclear Waste Expert. “Environmental Racism, Tribal Sovereignty and Nuclear Waste” Nuclear Information and Resource Service, February 15, 2001. SA-IB
	34	+
	35	+Nevadans and Utahans living downwind … the Earth spokesperson Winona LaDuke.
	36	+
	37	+====Thus I advocate that countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. Hyper specific questions of implementation aren’t important – there is no one method of decommissioning. The affirmative defends the resolution as a general principle and defends a phase out model as a recognition that nuclear power is not viable. Phase out is the only viable way to get rid of nuclear power. Lucas 12:====
	38	+Caroline, MP for Brighton Pavillion and a member of the cross-party parliamentary environment audit committee. “Why we must phase out nuclear power” Feb 17, 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/17/phase-out-nuclear-power SA-IB
	39	+
	40	+The inherent risk in the … give up on nuclear power.
	41	+
	42	+====And ‘ought’ simply entails an ideal or a valuation – the affirmative orients itself to a value of countries prohibiting nuclear power. Robinson 71:====
	43	+Richard, Oriel College Oxford. “Ought and Ought Not” Philosophy Vol. 46, Issue 177, pp 193-202. July 1971. SA-IB
	44	+
	45	+Many ought-sentences are not prescriptive. … They are expressing an ideal.
	46	+
	47	+====The resolution is a pedagogical starting point to examine our relationship to nature – nuclear power is the perfection of technological thought – the creation of a system in which nature is forced to give all it has so that humanity can maintain energy use. Nuclear power represents humanity’s challenge to nature. Kokobun 13:====
	48	+Koichiro, Associate Professor @ Takasaki City University of Economics. “Philosiphy in the Atomic Age” May 30, 2013. SA-IB
	49	+
	50	+Heidegger had great insight into … the world of living things.
	51	+
	52	+====The affirmative empirically causes a shift to wind and solar power – japan proves. Watanabe 11:====
	53	+Chisaki, Meridian Energy and author at Bloomberg. “Japan Spurs Solar, Wing Energy With Subsidies for Renewables” August 26, 2011. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-08-26/japan-passes-renewable-energy-bill-one-precondition-of-kan-s-resignation SA-IB
	54	+
	55	+Japan approved a bill today … generate more than 1 gigawatt.
	56	+
	57	+====Toxic preservation of existence and technological thought lead to coercion of other entities – as we are deemed more important. Burke 07:====
	58	+Burke ‘7 (Anthony Burke, Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at UNSW, Sydney, “Ontologies of War: Violence, Existence, and Reason”, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007, Project Muse)
	59	+
	60	+Thus war and existence are … enemy to do our will'.11
	61	+
	62	+====This attempt to control our surroundings leads to a violent determination to shape and secure the realities around us – this results in falsified military predictions. Carr 10:====
	63	+Matt Carr, freelance writer, published in Race and Class, Slouching towards dystopia: the new military futurism, http://www.societaitalianastoriamilitare.org/libri20in20regalo/201020CARR20New-Military-Futurism.pdf
	64	+
	65	+This determination to shape, control … are often very grim indeed.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-27 22:14:42.561

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cavanaugh, Taylor

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Dulles AW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+21

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+St Andrews Bhatt Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPOCT - Technology 1AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill RR