| ... |
... |
@@ -1,16
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==The discourse of "Terrorism" represents opposite binaries portraying the "terrorists" as the enemy of the West. == |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-===Jackson 07-(Richard, Ph.D in conflict resolution, 2007, Government and Opposition, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 394–426, "Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse)=== |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-The discourse is first |
| 6 |
|
-as the enemy of Western societies. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-==The discourse perpetuates a cycle of political violence, hindering any dialogue.== |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-===Talbot 08 (Steven, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Sociological Research Online 13(1)17 'Us' and 'Them': Terrorism, Conflict and (O)ther Discursive Formations, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/1/17.html) === |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-When examining issues concerning |
| 16 |
|
-of mutually sustaining antagonisms ensuring further conflict. |