| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+==The discourse of "Terrorism" represents opposite binaries portraying the "terrorists" as the enemy of the West. == |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+===Jackson 07-(Richard, Ph.D in conflict resolution, 2007, Government and Opposition, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 394–426, "Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse)=== |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+The discourse is first |
|
6 |
+as the enemy of Western societies. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+==The discourse perpetuates a cycle of political violence, hindering any dialogue.== |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+===Talbot 08 (Steven, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Sociological Research Online 13(1)17 'Us' and 'Them': Terrorism, Conflict and (O)ther Discursive Formations, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/1/17.html) === |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+When examining issues concerning |
|
16 |
+of mutually sustaining antagonisms ensuring further conflict. |