| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+**====The United States ought to implement a sliding scale model for civil rights litigation compensation as explained by the solvency advocate. ====** |
|
2 |
+**Emery and Maazel 1**, Richard, and Ilann Margalit Maazel. "Why Civil Rights Lawsuits Do Not Deter Police Misconduct: The Conundrum of Indemnification and a Proposed Solution." Fordham Urb. LJ 28 (2000): 587. SM |
|
3 |
+A better solution compensates and deters. That can be achieved by the following: |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+NYPD, then the city should indemnify a greater part of the judgment. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====The CP is the best of both worlds—holds the police and city to a level of accountability that is predicated off of the misconduct itself—if the city is at fault it pays more, if the officer is more at fault they pay more==== |
|
9 |
+**Emery and Maazel 2**, Richard, and Ilann Margalit Maazel. "Why Civil Rights Lawsuits Do Not Deter Police Misconduct: The Conundrum of Indemnification and a Proposed Solution." Fordham Urb. LJ 28 (2000): 587. SM |
|
10 |
+This would put the city on notice that its disciplinary procedures are inadequate, and |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+that the City shall indemnify greater than fifty-percent of the judgment. |