| ... |
... |
@@ -1,75
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-===Fwk=== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====I value morality since ought implies a moral obligation==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====We morally exclude people based on arbitrarily perceived differences—structural violence is rooted in this exclusion==== |
| 8 |
|
-**Winter**, Deborah Du Nann, **and **Dana C. **Leighton**. "STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE." Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century. (19**99**):. Print. ~~Don't worry I re-cut it~~ |
| 9 |
|
-Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about |
| 10 |
|
-AND |
| 11 |
|
-thinking can be fostered by relationships, communication, and appreciation of diversity. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====Thus the standard is reducing structural violence==== |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====This means the Aff framing is a pre-requisite to any other moral framework—"out-groups" will never be noticed and included in our moral discussions, so we need to eliminate structural barriers first to ensure a seat for all==== |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-====Even if my opponent wins that education is important, without challenging the structural barriers that prevent minorities from engaging in education means that we must prioritize solving structural violence ==== |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-==== Challenging institutional racism comes first—it makes violence inevitable which turns their util first args ==== |
| 24 |
|
-Albert **Memmi 2k**, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ U of Paris, Naiteire, Racism, Translated by Steve Martinot, p. 163-165 |
| 25 |
|
-The struggle against racism will be long, difficult, without intermission, without remission |
| 26 |
|
-AND |
| 27 |
|
-. True, it is a wager, but the stakes are irresistible. |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
- |
| 30 |
|
-===Contention 1 is hate speech=== |
| 31 |
|
- |
| 32 |
|
- |
| 33 |
|
-====Hate speech is protected under the first amendment==== |
| 34 |
|
-**McGough 15**, Michael. "Sorry, Kids, the 1st Amendment Does Protect 'hate Speech'." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 30 Oct. 2015. Web. 08 Jan. 2017. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-colleges-hate-speech-1st-amendment-20151030-story.html. SM |
| 35 |
|
-As Eugene Volokh of UCLA law school pointed out on his blog in the Washington |
| 36 |
|
-AND |
| 37 |
|
-, their words are protected by the Constitution — whatever college students think. |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
- |
| 40 |
|
-====Hate speech has long term silencing effects—that's terminal defense on the aff. Even if people aren't silenced they're more likely to agree with the dominant voice to avoid ==== |
| 41 |
|
-**West 12**, Caroline. "Words that silence? Freedom of expression and racist hate speech." Speech and Harm: controversies over free speech (2012): 222-48. |
| 42 |
|
-In addition to its immediate disabling effects, racist hate speech may have indirect and |
| 43 |
|
-AND |
| 44 |
|
-, the opinions that they voice will be ones that contest established opinions. |
| 45 |
|
- |
| 46 |
|
- |
| 47 |
|
-====And this disproportionately harms minorities—it justifies their exclusion from discussions which perpetuates dominant ideologies ==== |
| 48 |
|
-**West 12**, Caroline. "Words that silence? Freedom of expression and racist hate speech." Speech and Harm: controversies over free speech (2012): 222-48. |
| 49 |
|
-In these and other ways, racist hate speech may cause those it targets to |
| 50 |
|
-AND |
| 51 |
|
-who are silenced are likely to bear a disproportionate share of the loss. |
| 52 |
|
- |
| 53 |
|
- |
| 54 |
|
-====Hate speech leads to drop outs==== |
| 55 |
|
-**Wilkerson 88**, Isabel. "Campus Blacks Feel Racism's Nuances." The New York Times. The New York Times, 16 Apr. 1988. Web. 11 Jan. 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/17/us/campus-blacks-feel-racism-s-nuances.html?pagewanted=all. SM |
| 56 |
|
-Recent incidents of harassment and violence at the University of Michigan and other campuses have |
| 57 |
|
-AND |
| 58 |
|
-, keep my fingers crossed and hope somebody else black comes in.'' |
| 59 |
|
- |
| 60 |
|
- |
| 61 |
|
-===Contention 2 is endowments=== |
| 62 |
|
- |
| 63 |
|
- |
| 64 |
|
-====Promoting free speech would mean rejecting endowments from partisan donors.==== |
| 65 |
|
-**Kurtz 15** (Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a former adjunct fellow with Hudson Institute,"A Plan to Restore Free Speech on Campus," The National Review, December 7, 2015 JC) |
| 66 |
|
-Colleges and universities ought to adopt policies on institutional political neutrality based on the University |
| 67 |
|
-AND |
| 68 |
|
-Harvey Silverglate in its guide to academic freedom. Trustees should take note. |
| 69 |
|
- |
| 70 |
|
- |
| 71 |
|
-====Endowments are key to recruiting more low-income students which creates more material equalities on campus.==== |
| 72 |
|
-**Freedman 13** (Josh Freedman, policy analyst in the Economic Growth Program at the New America Foundation, "Why American Colleges Are Becoming a Force for Inequality," The Atlantic, May 16, 2013, JC) |
| 73 |
|
-This is not a sustainable model. Colleges will not be able to raise sticker |
| 74 |
|
-AND |
| 75 |
|
-to cover its costs while remaining competitive in its levels of spending. |