| ... |
... |
@@ -1,41
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====University Free Speech Focuses on the Individual Over Social Relations, Re-Entrenching Every Form of Oppression==== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
| 4 |
|
-The individual, instead of the social relations between individuals, is at the center |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-differentiates power. It constitutes the relationship between individuals. It is power. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-====This Support for Individuality Arises From Hundreds Of Years of White Male Centered Politics==== |
| 10 |
|
-Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
| 11 |
|
-The liberal tradition fails to respond to any systemic, inherent oppression in liberal society |
| 12 |
|
-AND |
| 13 |
|
-how the protection of hate speech is rationalized are products of that tradition. |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-====Status Quo Liberal Ideologies Can't Solve==== |
| 17 |
|
-Altman, A. (1993). Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination. Ethics, 103(2), 302-317. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381524 -SVJK) |
| 18 |
|
-The liberal will not accept the regulation of racist, sexist, or homo- |
| 19 |
|
-AND |
| 20 |
|
-these kinds of harm in order to justify any hate-speech regulation. |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-====Hate speech isn't educational and cause long-lasting harm. It doesn't provoke thoughts or debates between students or cause any tangible good outcome, except for harming those targeted. (Targeting is different than debating)==== |
| 24 |
|
-A pro-con discussion of speech codes and free speech Gerald Uelmen Nov 15, 1990 https://www.scu.edu/character/resources/campus-hate-speech-codes/ |
| 25 |
|
-Those who advocate hate speech codes believe that the harm codes prevent is more important |
| 26 |
|
-AND |
| 27 |
|
-free speech, and the just balance between individual rights and group rights. |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
- |
| 30 |
|
-====The alternative is to reject liberal perspectives of free speech, adopting an ethic of care==== |
| 31 |
|
-Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
| 32 |
|
-To negotiate this difficult terrain between the interchange of ideas and the harmful effects of |
| 33 |
|
-AND |
| 34 |
|
-victims of hate speech that invariably impacts on their liberty (West 764). |
| 35 |
|
- |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
-====The Fighting Words Doctrine is Another Example of Macho Male Discourse==== |
| 38 |
|
-Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
| 39 |
|
-Lawrence's work illuminates this problem for minorities in a way that is also relevant to |
| 40 |
|
-AND |
| 41 |
|
-~~and~~ captures the 'macho' quality of male discourse" (454). |