| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,84 @@ |
|
1 |
+====University Free Speech Focuses on the Individual Over Social Relations, Re-Entrenching Every Form of Oppression==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
4 |
+The individual, instead of the social relations between individuals, is at the center |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+differentiates power. It constitutes the relationship between individuals. It is power. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====This Support for Individuality Arises From Hundreds Of Years of White Male Centered Politics==== |
|
10 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
11 |
+The liberal tradition fails to respond to any systemic, inherent oppression in liberal society |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+how the protection of hate speech is rationalized are products of that tradition. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Status Quo Liberal Ideologies Can't Solve==== |
|
17 |
+Altman, A. (1993). Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination. Ethics, 103(2), 302-317. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381524 -SVJK) |
|
18 |
+The liberal will not accept the regulation of racist, sexist, or homo- |
|
19 |
+AND |
|
20 |
+these kinds of harm in order to justify any hate-speech regulation. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+====Hate speech isn't educational and cause long-lasting harm. It doesn't provoke thoughts or debates between students or cause any tangible good outcome, except for harming those targeted. (Targeting is different than debating)==== |
|
24 |
+A pro-con discussion of speech codes and free speech Gerald Uelmen Nov 15, 1990 https://www.scu.edu/character/resources/campus-hate-speech-codes/ |
|
25 |
+Those who advocate hate speech codes believe that the harm codes prevent is more important |
|
26 |
+AND |
|
27 |
+free speech, and the just balance between individual rights and group rights. |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+====The alternative is to reject liberal perspectives of free speech, adopting an ethic of care==== |
|
31 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
32 |
+To negotiate this difficult terrain between the interchange of ideas and the harmful effects of |
|
33 |
+AND |
|
34 |
+victims of hate speech that invariably impacts on their liberty (West 764). |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+====The Fighting Words Doctrine is Another Example of Macho Male Discourse==== |
|
38 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
39 |
+Lawrence's work illuminates this problem for minorities in a way that is also relevant to |
|
40 |
+AND |
|
41 |
+~~and~~ captures the 'macho' quality of male discourse" (454). |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+====University Free Speech Focuses on the Individual Over Social Relations, Re-Entrenching Every Form of Oppression==== |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
47 |
+The individual, instead of the social relations between individuals, is at the center |
|
48 |
+AND |
|
49 |
+differentiates power. It constitutes the relationship between individuals. It is power. |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+====This Support for Individuality Arises From Hundreds Of Years of White Male Centered Politics==== |
|
53 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
54 |
+The liberal tradition fails to respond to any systemic, inherent oppression in liberal society |
|
55 |
+AND |
|
56 |
+how the protection of hate speech is rationalized are products of that tradition. |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+====Status Quo Liberal Ideologies Can't Solve==== |
|
60 |
+Altman, A. (1993). Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination. Ethics, 103(2), 302-317. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381524 -SVJK) |
|
61 |
+The liberal will not accept the regulation of racist, sexist, or homo- |
|
62 |
+AND |
|
63 |
+these kinds of harm in order to justify any hate-speech regulation. |
|
64 |
+ |
|
65 |
+ |
|
66 |
+====Hate speech isn't educational and cause long-lasting harm. It doesn't provoke thoughts or debates between students or cause any tangible good outcome, except for harming those targeted. (Targeting is different than debating)==== |
|
67 |
+A pro-con discussion of speech codes and free speech Gerald Uelmen Nov 15, 1990 https://www.scu.edu/character/resources/campus-hate-speech-codes/ |
|
68 |
+Those who advocate hate speech codes believe that the harm codes prevent is more important |
|
69 |
+AND |
|
70 |
+free speech, and the just balance between individual rights and group rights. |
|
71 |
+ |
|
72 |
+ |
|
73 |
+====The alternative is to reject liberal perspectives of free speech, adopting an ethic of care==== |
|
74 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
75 |
+To negotiate this difficult terrain between the interchange of ideas and the harmful effects of |
|
76 |
+AND |
|
77 |
+victims of hate speech that invariably impacts on their liberty (West 764). |
|
78 |
+ |
|
79 |
+ |
|
80 |
+====The Fighting Words Doctrine is Another Example of Macho Male Discourse==== |
|
81 |
+Cornwell, N. (1998). Rethinking Free Expression in the Feminist Classroom: The Problem of Hate Speech. Feminist Teacher, 12(2), 107-118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545815 - SVJK) |
|
82 |
+Lawrence's work illuminates this problem for minorities in a way that is also relevant to |
|
83 |
+AND |
|
84 |
+~~and~~ captures the 'macho' quality of male discourse" (454). |