Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[52]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[53]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[52]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-13 04:49:21.56
	1	+2017-03-13 04:49:21.0

Caselist.CitesClass[53]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,22 @@
	1	+Interpretation: The affirmative must specify an enforcement mechanism by which they guarantee the right to housing in a explicitly delineated plan text in the 1ac. To clarify, you can defend the whole rez or guarantee it for specific groups – you just need to specify it. This can be a policy action, enshrining the right in the constitution, or recognizing it in state law.
	2	+
	3	+Violation: They don’t. Their Carson evidence talks about Title VI, IHBG Grant, income security, etc. but their CHRN evidence talks about some value-orientation and other cards are worse – the fact that she doesn't have an explicit plan text in the aff magnifies the abuse.
	4	+
	5	+The standard is ground.
	6	+
	7	+There are two different interps of the right and they’re radically distinct.
	8	+Fitzpatrick and Watts Suzanne and Beth(Suzanne Fitzpatrick is affiliated with the School of the Built Environment, Heriot- Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; Beth Watts is affiliated with the Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, England, UK) ‘The Right to Housing’ for Homeless People, Homelessness Research in Europe, Date Accessed 2/19/17 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.1897andrep=rep1andtype=pdf
	9	+A key distinction
	10	+each individual case.
	11	+
	12	+There is no well-defined singular “right” to housing – specifying is key to good debates and is what the topic lit centers around.
	13	+NLCHP 11National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty , “Simply Unacceptable”: Homelessness and the Human Right to Housing In the United States, 2011, https://www.nlchp.org/Simply_Unacceptable Premier
	14	+More than ever, housing
	15	+into meaningful action.
	16	+
	17	+Next is framing:
	18	+Fairness is a voter
	19	+drop the debater
	20	+use competing interps
	21	+No RVIs
	22	+No reason why theory comes first in the last speech – we get new 2NR answers.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-13 04:49:21.695

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Blake Andrews

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Williams JK

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+32

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Seven Lakes Sim Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+MA - ESpec

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+TFA State