| ... |
... |
@@ -1,16
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Interpretation: At 2017 TFA State, the affirmative may not specify a specific policy enforcement mechanism to guarantee the right to housing. To clarify, you can read plans that guarantee it for specific groups of people such as refugees and also spec actors but you cannot implement a specific policy that guarantees it. |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Violation: They specify a policy. |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-The standard is limits. |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-There are way too many affs. |
| 8 |
|
-Hartman 98 Hartman, Chester. (Hartman is Executive Director of the Poverty and Race Research Action Council in Washington, DC.) "The Case for a Right to Housing." Housing Policy Debate 9.2 (1998): 223-41. Web. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b39f/779ea88791e8f08dbb1351ec060ab6439085.pdf. |
| 9 |
|
-What are the components |
| 10 |
|
-loss of one’s home. |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-Next is framing: |
| 13 |
|
-Fairness is a voter |
| 14 |
|
-drop the debater |
| 15 |
|
-use competing interps |
| 16 |
|
-No RVIs |