| ... |
... |
@@ -1,29
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Identifying an environment as separate from civilization reduces it to an object to be managed for the good of civilization – this is not a critique of anthropocentrism, but rather a critique of the delineation between humans and nature. |
| 2 |
|
-Luke 95 (Timothy, Department of Political Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, also he blew up the death star ‘On Environmentality: Geo-Power and Eco-Knowledge in the Discourses of Contemporary Environmentalism’ Cultural Critique, No. 31, The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part II p.57-81 (Autumn,1995)) |
| 3 |
|
-The separation of organisms |
| 4 |
|
-policing of ecological spaces. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Environmental policymaking is focused on viewing the earth as a resource that dispenses services and creates natural and artificial events – their goal is to map, measure, and monitor ecology. |
| 7 |
|
-Luke 9, University Distinguished Professor of Political Science. Chair, Department of Political Science. Professor Luke's areas of research include environmental politics and cultural studies, as well as comparative politics, international political economy, and modern critical social and political theory. (Timothy, “Developing planetarian accountancy: Fabricating nature as stock, service, and system for green governmentality”, in Harry F. Dahms (ed.) Nature, Knowledge and Negation (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 26), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.129-159)//ED |
| 8 |
|
-The ordinary operations |
| 9 |
|
-complex ecologies and economies (Briden and Downing, 2002) |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-This assumption is pure environmental dualism – the impact is ecocide and extinction. |
| 12 |
|
-The Dark Mountain 9 (Uncivilization, network of writers, artists, and thinkers, The Dark Mountain Manifesto, http://dark-mountain.net/about/manifesto/, 2009)JFS/NAR |
| 13 |
|
-The myth of progress |
| 14 |
|
-which our lifestyles depend. |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-This dualistic thinking about “human culture” and “nature” is the root of all exclusion |
| 17 |
|
-Frank 3 (Roslyn, University of Iowa, Shifting Identities: The Metaphorics of Nature-Culture Dualism in Western and Basque Models of Self, http://www.metaphorik.de/04/frank.pdf)JFS |
| 18 |
|
-These dyads reflect the |
| 19 |
|
-role in modernist epistemology (cf. again Latour 1993). |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-This dualism destroys meaning in the natural world, makes our lives pointless, and justifies environmental exploitation |
| 22 |
|
-Ratner 11 (Dena, Louisiana State University, Bhatter College Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (ISSN 2249-3301), Volume 1, Number 1, 2011, Special Issue on Earth, Nature, Environment, Ecosystem and Human Society)JFS |
| 23 |
|
-There are two kinds of nothing that have a dangerous impact on the environment. One stems from dualistic philosophies that treat the outside world as that which has no meaning. Although dualism had been prevalent in Greek philosophy and Christian theology, Descartes built on the idea that nature has no intrinsic |
| 24 |
|
-and eternally depart. |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-The alternative is to reject the 1ac’s environmental dualisms – this eliminates the concept of an “environment” and solves destruction of the planet. |
| 27 |
|
-Rowe 96 Stan Rowe, Professor Emeritus at the University of Saskatchewan, 1996 (“From Shallow To Deep Ecological Philosophy,” Trumpeter, Volume 13, Number 1, Available Online at http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/278/413)JFS |
| 28 |
|
-Organisms can be “alive” |
| 29 |
|
-roots of evolutionary creativity. |