| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,9 @@ |
|
1 |
+Thus, I affirm Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any speech protected by the Cross Examination Debate Association’s constitution. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+To clarify, this only applies to college policy debate – sexual harassment, discrimination, and exclusion of performative arguments are prohibited. |
|
4 |
+CEDA constitution "Section 1: The Nature of the Academic Debate Community." CONSTITUTION OF THE CROSS EXAMINATION DEBATE ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I: THE ORGANIZATION (n.d.): n. pag. Mar. 2016. Web. |
|
5 |
+It is the nature |
|
6 |
+those enumerated above. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+The advantage is about how we should allow debaters to do alternative styles of debating away from traditional policy in college policy debate spaces. |