| ... |
... |
@@ -1,9
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Non-consensual explicit image distribution is constitutionally protected—case law proves and outweighs |
| 2 |
|
-Larkin Paul J. Larkin Jr., Senior Legal Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation, “Revenge Porn, State Law, and Free Speech,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Oct. 1, 2014 JW |
| 3 |
|
-The Internet serves ... Court answered, “No.” |
| 4 |
|
-College is the hotbed for non-consensual image distribution due to the amount of sexting on campus |
| 5 |
|
-Reid 14 Samantha Reid, reporter at USA Today, “Study says 70 of students have sexted, so how do they feel about revenge porn?” USA Today, May 15, 2014, http://college.usatoday.com/2014/05/15/study-says-70-of-students-have-sexted-so-how-do-they-feel-about-revenge-porn/ JW |
| 6 |
|
-College students are ... can be problematic. |
| 7 |
|
-Turns case – non-consensual image distribution causes chilling effect for the targeted who are afraid to speak out and are silenced. |
| 8 |
|
-Citron 14 Danielle Keats Citron Mary Anne Franks 2014 "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" Wake Forest Law Review digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2424andcontext=fac_pubs |
| 9 |
|
-Free expression allows ... and intimate selves. |