| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,9 @@ |
|
1 |
+Non-consensual explicit image distribution is constitutionally protected—case law proves and outweighs |
|
2 |
+Larkin Paul J. Larkin Jr., Senior Legal Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation, “Revenge Porn, State Law, and Free Speech,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Oct. 1, 2014 JW |
|
3 |
+The Internet serves ... Court answered, “No.” |
|
4 |
+College is the hotbed for non-consensual image distribution due to the amount of sexting on campus |
|
5 |
+Reid 14 Samantha Reid, reporter at USA Today, “Study says 70 of students have sexted, so how do they feel about revenge porn?” USA Today, May 15, 2014, http://college.usatoday.com/2014/05/15/study-says-70-of-students-have-sexted-so-how-do-they-feel-about-revenge-porn/ JW |
|
6 |
+College students are ... can be problematic. |
|
7 |
+Turns case – non-consensual image distribution causes chilling effect for the targeted who are afraid to speak out and are silenced. |
|
8 |
+Citron 14 Danielle Keats Citron Mary Anne Franks 2014 "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" Wake Forest Law Review digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2424andcontext=fac_pubs |
|
9 |
+Free expression allows ... and intimate selves. |