| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+Practical reflection is inescapable |
|
2 |
+Ferrero Luca Ferrero (University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee) “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency” Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. IV January 12th 2009 pp. 6-8 |
|
3 |
+Agency is special ... closed under itself. |
|
4 |
+The standard is respecting equal freedom. |
|
5 |
+In the state of nature, might not right resolves competing rights claims so a public authority is necessary. |
|
6 |
+Varden A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” by Helga Varden Chapter from: “Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World” edited by Deirdre Golash 2010 |
|
7 |
+“The first important ... anyone’s arbitrary choices.” |
|
8 |
+Offense~-~- I defend a restriction on seditious speech. According to Cornell Law https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/395/44, Brandenburg v. Ohio held that seditious speech is constitutionally protected. |
|
9 |
+But seditious speech is never permissible because the intent requires the right to destroy the state. |
|
10 |
+Varden 2 A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” by Helga Varden Chapter from: “Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World” edited by Deirdre Golash 2010 |
|
11 |
+To understand Kant’s ... a public crime |