Changes for page Scarsdale Zipursky Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,37 +1,0 @@ 1 -Part 1 is the Burden 2 -The neg burden is to prove that there is be a morally relevant distinction between police officers and other individuals while the aff burden that this is not the case. Prefer the burden: 3 -1. Analytic 4 -2. Phil Ed: UNC UNC University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, "Why Major in Philosophy?," Name of website. Website Editor(s). Date of electronic publication. Date of access. http://philosophy.unc.edu/undergraduate-program/why-major-in-philosophy. 5 -Having …you might encounter. 6 -3. Legal Context: Blum 08 (Karen Blum, Suffolk University, “Section 1983: Qualified Immunity”, December 2008) 7 -In both the …interaction with Jones.”) 8 -4. Critical Education: Steering (Jerry Steering, Steering Law, “Why the Police Get Away with Violating Your Rights”) 9 - 10 -The police “oppress” …police misconduct cases.) 11 -5. Analytic 12 -Analytic 13 - 14 -Part 2 is Offense 15 - 16 -I’ll defend implementation if asked in CX and make any other specifications they want in order to meet their theory interps. Implementation and further specification are irrelevant under the burden but I am still willing to defend them. 17 - 18 - First, morally relevant distinctions can only be based on a priori reasoning. 19 -A. Normativity flow from reasoning via a priori categories; natural facts only show what is. Kant: 20 - 21 -We have therefore …every human being. 22 - 23 -B. Analytic 24 - 25 -C. Analytic 26 - 27 -D. Analytic 28 -There is no a priori distinction between police officers and other individuals: 29 -A. Analytic 30 -B. Analytic 31 - 32 -Second, even if empirical distinctions are morally relevant, you still affirm: 33 - 34 -A. We can never prove an empirical distinction between individuals because no amount of subjective evidence can ever prove objective knowledge of the external world. Searle Searle, John R. Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books; 2000. (27). 35 -You could have …of these scenarios. 36 -B. Even if there is an objective external world, all objects are one and the same within it which means that there is no distinction between any people. Schaffer Schaffer, Jonathan, "Monism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/monism/. 37 -To my knowledge …premises seem plausible.19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-23 18:52:01.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake EE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scarsdale Zipursky Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Nov-Dec Fun AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-23 18:51:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake EE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC- This 2 -NC- Curry and Wilderson - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,37 @@ 1 +Part 1 is the Burden 2 +The neg burden is to prove that there is be a morally relevant distinction between police officers and other individuals while the aff burden that this is not the case. Prefer the burden: 3 +1. Analytic 4 +2. Phil Ed: UNC UNC University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, "Why Major in Philosophy?," Name of website. Website Editor(s). Date of electronic publication. Date of access. http://philosophy.unc.edu/undergraduate-program/why-major-in-philosophy. 5 +Having …you might encounter. 6 +3. Legal Context: Blum 08 (Karen Blum, Suffolk University, “Section 1983: Qualified Immunity”, December 2008) 7 +In both the …interaction with Jones.”) 8 +4. Critical Education: Steering (Jerry Steering, Steering Law, “Why the Police Get Away with Violating Your Rights”) 9 + 10 +The police “oppress” …police misconduct cases.) 11 +5. Analytic 12 +Analytic 13 + 14 +Part 2 is Offense 15 + 16 +I’ll defend implementation if asked in CX and make any other specifications they want in order to meet their theory interps. Implementation and further specification are irrelevant under the burden but I am still willing to defend them. 17 + 18 + First, morally relevant distinctions can only be based on a priori reasoning. 19 +A. Normativity flow from reasoning via a priori categories; natural facts only show what is. Kant: 20 + 21 +We have therefore …every human being. 22 + 23 +B. Analytic 24 + 25 +C. Analytic 26 + 27 +D. Analytic 28 +There is no a priori distinction between police officers and other individuals: 29 +A. Analytic 30 +B. Analytic 31 + 32 +Second, even if empirical distinctions are morally relevant, you still affirm: 33 + 34 +A. We can never prove an empirical distinction between individuals because no amount of subjective evidence can ever prove objective knowledge of the external world. Searle Searle, John R. Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books; 2000. (27). 35 +You could have …of these scenarios. 36 +B. Even if there is an objective external world, all objects are one and the same within it which means that there is no distinction between any people. Schaffer Schaffer, Jonathan, "Monism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/monism/. 37 +To my knowledge …premises seem plausible.19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-21 01:11:25.590 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake EE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale Zipursky Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Nov-Dec Fun AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-21 01:11:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake EE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks