Changes for page Scarsdale Zipursky Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 4 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,37 +1,0 @@ 1 -Part 1 is the Burden 2 -The neg burden is to prove that there is be a morally relevant distinction between police officers and other individuals while the aff burden that this is not the case. Prefer the burden: 3 -1. Analytic 4 -2. Phil Ed: UNC UNC University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, "Why Major in Philosophy?," Name of website. Website Editor(s). Date of electronic publication. Date of access. http://philosophy.unc.edu/undergraduate-program/why-major-in-philosophy. 5 -Having …you might encounter. 6 -3. Legal Context: Blum 08 (Karen Blum, Suffolk University, “Section 1983: Qualified Immunity”, December 2008) 7 -In both the …interaction with Jones.”) 8 -4. Critical Education: Steering (Jerry Steering, Steering Law, “Why the Police Get Away with Violating Your Rights”) 9 - 10 -The police “oppress” …police misconduct cases.) 11 -5. Analytic 12 -Analytic 13 - 14 -Part 2 is Offense 15 - 16 -I’ll defend implementation if asked in CX and make any other specifications they want in order to meet their theory interps. Implementation and further specification are irrelevant under the burden but I am still willing to defend them. 17 - 18 - First, morally relevant distinctions can only be based on a priori reasoning. 19 -A. Normativity flow from reasoning via a priori categories; natural facts only show what is. Kant: 20 - 21 -We have therefore …every human being. 22 - 23 -B. Analytic 24 - 25 -C. Analytic 26 - 27 -D. Analytic 28 -There is no a priori distinction between police officers and other individuals: 29 -A. Analytic 30 -B. Analytic 31 - 32 -Second, even if empirical distinctions are morally relevant, you still affirm: 33 - 34 -A. We can never prove an empirical distinction between individuals because no amount of subjective evidence can ever prove objective knowledge of the external world. Searle Searle, John R. Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books; 2000. (27). 35 -You could have …of these scenarios. 36 -B. Even if there is an objective external world, all objects are one and the same within it which means that there is no distinction between any people. Schaffer Schaffer, Jonathan, "Monism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/monism/. 37 -To my knowledge …premises seem plausible.19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-21 01:11:25.590 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake EE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scarsdale Zipursky Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Nov-Dec Fun AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-21 01:11:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake EE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,55 @@ 1 +Part 1 is Framework 2 +There is no possibility of understanding a person in and of herself. All identities are understood through power relations – the differentiation of the subject through social relations, which are constantly changing and must, by necessity be constantly changing. Butler ‘92 3 +Judith Butler. 1992. “Continent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism” Feminists Theorize the Political) 4 +In a sense,... to politics itself. 5 + 6 +Power is ubiquitous and fluid—it creates the subject. Orme 7 +Orme, Stephen. "Foucault: Subject, Power, Resistance." Academia.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 July 2016. 8 +We must imagine ...trans-individual process.' 9 + 10 +The judge should be an intellectual examining the accuracy of the processes that construct truth and how they interact with power structures. Foucault 11 +Michel Foucault, interviewed by Alessandro Fontana, Pasquale Pasquino, "TRUTH AND POWER" 12 +‘Truth’ is to...the present time. 13 + 14 +Governmentality is a form of power that is instrumental in constructing truth. Foucault 2 Power and Knowledge, 1980 15 +There is a battle …the truth itself. 16 + 17 +Understanding our relationship to political power is the only way to avoid a kind of causal determinism—otherwise we are always conditioned by power and can never escape it. Foucault 3 Foucault, Michel. 18 +Hermneutique du suet English 19 +The hermeneutics of the subject: lectures at the College de France, 1981-1982 / Michel Foucault; edited by FrandJeYic Gros; general editors, Francois Ewald and Alessandro Fontana ; translated by Graham Burchell. 20 +In other words, …with blameworthy stubbornness. 21 + 22 +Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater whose analysis better examines political governmentality. 23 + 24 +Part 2 is Genealogy 25 +The framework requires a non-normative examination of history. Koopman ‘13 Koopman, Colin. Genealogy as Critique. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 2013. Print. 26 + 27 +It is important...and critical theory. 28 + 29 +Critical analyses are key to understanding our subjectivity. May ‘06 30 +May, Todd(2006)'Michel Foucault's guide to living',Angelaki,11:3,173 — 184 31 +The rise of...one thought about. 32 + 33 +Here is a historical analysis of qualified immunity~-~-Qualified immunity has been constructed by the courts – it’s not a really an act of Congress and the progression of cases show the doctrine has come unmoored from any of the justifications that are offered for it. 34 +Huq 15, Aziz Z Professor of Law at UChicago Law School, Fmr. Deputy Director of the Brennan Center for Justice. "Judicial Independence and the Rationing of Constitutional Remedies." Duke Law Journal 65, no. 1 (2015). http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1978andcontext=public_law_and_legal_theory 35 +No federal statute...concerns are at play. 36 + 37 +Genealogy is valuable under any ethical theory. Yancy 38 +George Yancy Prof. Philosophy @ Dusquene, “What White Looks Like,” 2004 39 +A genealogical examination...evaluate and overcome. 40 + 41 +Part 3 is Analysis 42 + 43 +First, qualified immunity prevents analysis of the law. Care for the self requires a constant evaluation of the way that power has conditioned our surroundings and qualified immunity means that citizens take laws for granted. Hassel 99, Diana Associate Professor, Roger Williams University School of Law. B.A. 1979, Mount Holyoke College; J.D. 1985, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey- Newark. Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District of New York, 1988-93. "Living a Lie: The Cost of Qualified Immunity." Mo. L. Rev 64 (1999): 123. 44 +The problem with...professes to accomplish. 45 + 46 +Second, qualified immunity valorizes the police as distinct from the public—this unexamined form of dualism allows governmentality to go uncontested. Johnson 14 Theoria, Issue 141, Vol. 61, No. 4 (December 2014): 5-29 doi:10.3167/th.2014.6114102 • ISSN 0040-5817 (Print) • ISSN 1558-5816 (Online) 47 +The police are...handed police-state. 48 + 49 +he continues 50 +A fully developed...effec- tively combated. 51 + 52 +Third, Qualified immunity is a bankrupt principle – the doctrine establishes a static rule that governs our ability to interpret and redefine the law in instances related to police behavior. Wright '15 Sam (), 11-3-2015, "Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity," Above the Law, http://abovethelaw.com/2015/11/want-to-fight-police-misconduct-reform-qualified-immunity/ 53 +I think Megan...make it happen. 54 + 55 +Fourth, Analytic - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-22 05:03:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake CE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale Zipursky Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Nov-Dec Governmentality AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,37 @@ 1 +Part 1 is the Burden 2 +The neg burden is to prove that there is be a morally relevant distinction between police officers and other individuals while the aff burden that this is not the case. Prefer the burden: 3 +1. Analytic 4 +2. Phil Ed: UNC UNC University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, "Why Major in Philosophy?," Name of website. Website Editor(s). Date of electronic publication. Date of access. http://philosophy.unc.edu/undergraduate-program/why-major-in-philosophy. 5 +Having …you might encounter. 6 +3. Legal Context: Blum 08 (Karen Blum, Suffolk University, “Section 1983: Qualified Immunity”, December 2008) 7 +In both the …interaction with Jones.”) 8 +4. Critical Education: Steering (Jerry Steering, Steering Law, “Why the Police Get Away with Violating Your Rights”) 9 + 10 +The police “oppress” …police misconduct cases.) 11 +5. Analytic 12 +Analytic 13 + 14 +Part 2 is Offense 15 + 16 +I’ll defend implementation if asked in CX and make any other specifications they want in order to meet their theory interps. Implementation and further specification are irrelevant under the burden but I am still willing to defend them. 17 + 18 + First, morally relevant distinctions can only be based on a priori reasoning. 19 +A. Normativity flow from reasoning via a priori categories; natural facts only show what is. Kant: 20 + 21 +We have therefore …every human being. 22 + 23 +B. Analytic 24 + 25 +C. Analytic 26 + 27 +D. Analytic 28 +There is no a priori distinction between police officers and other individuals: 29 +A. Analytic 30 +B. Analytic 31 + 32 +Second, even if empirical distinctions are morally relevant, you still affirm: 33 + 34 +A. We can never prove an empirical distinction between individuals because no amount of subjective evidence can ever prove objective knowledge of the external world. Searle Searle, John R. Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books; 2000. (27). 35 +You could have …of these scenarios. 36 +B. Even if there is an objective external world, all objects are one and the same within it which means that there is no distinction between any people. Schaffer Schaffer, Jonathan, "Monism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/monism/. 37 +To my knowledge …premises seem plausible.19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-23 18:52:01.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake EE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale Zipursky Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Nov-Dec Fun AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +10 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-22 05:03:19.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake CE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-23 18:51:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Carlos Taylor - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake EE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +AC- This 2 +NC- Curry and Wilderson - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks