Changes for page Scarsdale Zipursky Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation: If either debater does not read the full card as they have it on their computer or on paper they must verbally say to “mark the card” at a particular word and they must also make a marking in the speech doc or on that piece of paper. 2 - 3 -Interpretation: The neg may not read multiple types of skepticism. To clarify, they could read any of the ones they did, the conjunction is just abusive. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-20 02:26:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Scarsdale Zipursky Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AR Interps Yale - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Yale