Changes for page Scarsdale Gelles Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-05 03:33:45. 7801 +2016-11-05 03:33:45.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,21 @@ 1 +Text: Congress should do the aff. 2 +CP solves – Congress can amend the relevant statute instead of waiting for the courts. 3 +Lynda G. Dodd 15, Joseph H. Flom Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at The City University of New York–City College, writing a book examining the Supreme Court’s development of the legal framework for Section 1983 litigation., 10-19-2015, "What's missing in the police reform debate? (Part 1)," Balkinization, https://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/10/whats-missing-in-police-reform-debate.html 4 +Because these doctrines … of significant statutory reform. 5 + 6 +Speed NB 7 + 8 +The Court takes years to act, whereas Congress can implement the plan now – all their advantages become linear disads vs the counterplan. 9 +Ornstein et al 11 – Continuity of Government Commission made up of Norman J. Ornstein political scientist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, Thomas E. Mann Averell Harriman Chair and a senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, John C. Fortier research fellow at AEI, and Jennifer K. Marsico AEI, 2011, “Preserving Our Institutions: The Third Report of the Continuity of Government Commission-The Supreme Court.” American Enterprise Institute, https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Supreme-Court-Continuity.pdf 10 +The Court’s Slow … after initial detainment. 11 + 12 +Culture Shift NB 13 +Only legislative action can change culture – judicial rulemaking is perceived as an undemocratic imposition, empirics prove. How you do the plan is matters and only the counterplan accesses this shift. 14 +Stoddard 97 (Thomas B. Stoddard, Former Professor of Law at NYU Law School, November 1997, New York University Law Review, “Bleeding Heart: Reflection on Using Law to Make Social Change,” pg. 7, http://law.ubalt.edu/law/ downloads/law_downloads/ Stoddard.pdf) 15 +The arena of … in the end, done. 16 + 17 +Uniquely important here - 18 +A. analytic 19 +B. Without a cultural shift courts can use their interpretive leeway to narrow disruptive opinions until they’re purely symbolic. 20 +Re 15 - Re, Richard M UCLA law faculty as Assistant Professor of Law.. "Narrowing Supreme Court precedent from below." Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming (2015). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2699607 21 +V. NARROWING AS RESISTANCE Another reason to … narrowing as resistance. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-05 03:33:47.783 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Victor Rivas Umana - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker SP - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale Gelles Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Congress CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +AV