| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,7 @@ |
|
1 |
+The counteradvocacy is the aff without narrative. Framing the demand for recognition in terms of stories of suffering makes personhood only accessible through injury – turns case: legitimizes violence and means any gains only reinscribe pain and subjugation.Tuck and Yang 14 |
|
2 |
+Eve Tuck Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations and Coordinator of Native American Studies at the State University of New York at New Paltz and K. Wayne Yang Assistant Professor of Ethnic Studies, Affiliated Professor of Urban Studies and Planning at UC San Diego, “R-Words: Refusing Research” (2014) https://faculty.newpaltz.edu/evetuck/files/2013/12/Tuck-and-Yang-R-Words_Refusing-Research.pdf |
|
3 |
+The costs of a … subjugation and pained existence?” (p. 55). |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+The counteradvocacy adequately portrays suffering and uses the knowledge we get from suffering so that we can work against it, but it refuses to satisfy the fascination with suffering and de-spectaclizes it. Tuck and Yang 2 explain with an example: |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+Gonzales-Day’s Erased … settler colonial knowledge. |