Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,21 +1,0 @@
1		-Text: Congress should do the aff.
2		-CP solves – Congress can amend the relevant statute instead of waiting for the courts.
3		-Lynda G. Dodd 15, Joseph H. Flom Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at The City University of New York–City College, writing a book examining the Supreme Court’s development of the legal framework for Section 1983 litigation., 10-19-2015, "What's missing in the police reform debate? (Part 1)," Balkinization, https://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/10/whats-missing-in-police-reform-debate.html
4		-Because these doctrines … of significant statutory reform.
5		-
6		-Speed NB
7		-
8		-The Court takes years to act, whereas Congress can implement the plan now – all their advantages become linear disads vs the counterplan.
9		-Ornstein et al 11 – Continuity of Government Commission made up of Norman J. Ornstein political scientist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, Thomas E. Mann Averell Harriman Chair and a senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, John C. Fortier research fellow at AEI, and Jennifer K. Marsico AEI, 2011, “Preserving Our Institutions: The Third Report of the Continuity of Government Commission-The Supreme Court.” American Enterprise Institute, https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Supreme-Court-Continuity.pdf
10		-The Court’s Slow … after initial detainment.
11		-
12		-Culture Shift NB
13		-Only legislative action can change culture – judicial rulemaking is perceived as an undemocratic imposition, empirics prove. How you do the plan is matters and only the counterplan accesses this shift.
14		-Stoddard 97 (Thomas B. Stoddard, Former Professor of Law at NYU Law School, November 1997, New York University Law Review, “Bleeding Heart: Reflection on Using Law to Make Social Change,” pg. 7, http://law.ubalt.edu/law/ downloads/law_downloads/ Stoddard.pdf)
15		-The arena of … in the end, done.
16		-
17		-Uniquely important here -
18		-A. analytic
19		-B. Without a cultural shift courts can use their interpretive leeway to narrow disruptive opinions until they’re purely symbolic.
20		-Re 15 - Re, Richard M UCLA law faculty as Assistant Professor of Law.. "Narrowing Supreme Court precedent from below." Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming (2015). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2699607
21		-V. NARROWING AS RESISTANCE Another reason to … narrowing as resistance.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-05 03:33:47.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Victor Rivas Umana

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harker SP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Scarsdale Gelles Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Congress CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-AV