| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+Humans have an innate right to freedom, which mandates a system of equal freedom. Ripstein 1 |
|
2 |
+Ripstein, Arthur. "Force and freedom." Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy(2009). PH |
|
3 |
+The Universal Principle...matter of right.25 |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+This logically implies a right to property- the material conditions of exercising one’s freedom is itself something we are entitled to, which precedes the needs of others. Ripstein 2 |
|
6 |
+Ripstein, Arthur. "Force and freedom." Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy(2009). PH |
|
7 |
+Thus the various...just a bundle.5 |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Thus the standard is respecting liberty |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Nuclear power generation does not constitute a use of force against another, so a ban on nuclear power is illegitimate. The miniscule risk from nuclear accidents doesn’t count. Levendis et al |
|
12 |
+John Levendis, Walter Block, Joseph Morrel. “Nuclear Power.” Journal of Business Ethics (2006) 67:37–49. |
|
13 |
+Let us make... any other such |
|
14 |
+This means you negate. Block |
|
15 |
+Block: Block, Walter Economics and Finance Department, University of Central Arkansas and Matthew Block Computer Science Department, Simon Fraser University. “Towards a Universal Libertarian Theory of Gun (Weapon) Control: a Spatial and Geographical Analysis.” Ethics, Place and Environment, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2000. |
|
16 |
+What is the...and legs (for karatekas), etc. |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+There’s no risk of offense claims from the aff |
|
19 |
+Ownership doesn’t necessitate misuse |