| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,65 @@ |
|
1 |
+====AFF actors should remove all restrictions on constitutionally protected free speech, and ban the usage of all hate speech, including hate speech not protected by the First Amendment. Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims and reinforces structural violence. Delgado 82:==== |
|
5 |
+Delgado 82, Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918 |
|
6 |
+In addition to the harms of immediate emotional distress and infringement of dignity, racial |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+," the child will find it difficult not to accept those judgments.76 |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====Hate speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups perpetuating structural inequalities.==== |
|
12 |
+**Greenblatt 15** Jonathan Greenblatt, When Hateful Speech Leads to Hate Crimes: Taking Bigotry Out of the Immigration Debate, Huffington Post, 8/21/15, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-greenblatt/when-hateful-speech-leads_b_8022966.html |
|
13 |
+When police arrived at the scene in Boston, they found a Latino man shaking |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+are working with a broad coalition of partners to get the ball rolling. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+====College Speech codes create an increase of free speech. Garrett 02==== |
|
19 |
+Garrett 02 Deanna M. Garrett Deanna M. Garrett graduated from the University of Virginia in 1997 with a bachelor's degree in Religious Studies and a minor in Biology. She is a second-year HESA student and a Graduate Assistant in the Department of Residential Life. "Silenced Voices: Hate Speech Codes on Campus" University of Vermont July 29, 2002 http://www.uvm.edu/~~~~vtconn/?Page=v20/garrett.html |
|
20 |
+Advocates of hate speech codes contend that the inclusion of racist, sexist, and |
|
21 |
+AND |
|
22 |
+shock" of racist speech systematically preempts response. (p. 143) |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+====First Amendment protections contribute to structural violence by prioritizing dominant groups—restrictions are key. Schroeder 12==== |
|
26 |
+Jared Schroeder, ~~doctoral candidate, Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communi-cation at the University of Oklahoma~~, "Electronically Transmitted Threats and Higher Education: Oppression, Free Speech, and Jake Baker," Review of Higher Education, 2012. |
|
27 |
+Another of the faces of oppression that Young (2010) outlined is violence. |
|
28 |
+AND |
|
29 |
+values of free speech and expression above protecting a dominated group from violence. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====Free speech is a tool of the ruling class to mask oppression. Kahn 15==== |
|
33 |
+Kahn 15 Tariq Khan (PhD Candidate in History, University of Illinois Urbana– Champaign). "Masking Oppression as Free Speech: An Anarchist Take." Hamp-ton Institute. 10 November 2015. http://www.hamptoninstitution.org/masking-oppression-as-free-speech.html |
|
34 |
+Out of necessity as much as out of conviction, anarchists in the United States |
|
35 |
+AND |
|
36 |
+go unchecked under the guise of a disingenuous notion of "free speech." |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+====The notion of free speech assumes that all voices are equally treated, when in reality power inequities shape who can speak what Boler 2000==== |
|
40 |
+Boler 2k Megan Boler (Professor in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and editor of Digital Media and Democracy), "All Speech is Not Free: The Ethics of "Affirmative Action Pedagogy," Philosophy of Education, 2000 |
|
41 |
+All speech is not free. Power inequities institutionalized through economies, gender roles, |
|
42 |
+AND |
|
43 |
+in our classrooms, even at the minor cost of limiting dominant voices. |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+====Free exchange of ideas is outweighed by need for direct action – anything else accepts racism, neoliberalism, and economic inequality as the norm==== |
|
47 |
+Tillett-Saks 13 Andrew Tillett-Saks (organizer with UNITE HERE Local 217), "Neoliberal Myths," Counterpunch, 11/7/2013 |
|
48 |
+The twofold argument against the protestors stems from two central myths of neoliberalism. The |
|
49 |
+AND |
|
50 |
+greater freedom. To the contrary, direct action has always proved necessary. |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+====Vagueness concerns are overstated; creating clear rules for offensive speech is feasible Byrne 91:==== |
|
54 |
+Byrne 91, J. Peter Byrne (Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center), Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University, 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991). |
|
55 |
+A central argument of this article has been that the university can be trusted to |
|
56 |
+AND |
|
57 |
+constitutional authority to regulate racial insults should not be troubled independently by vagueness. |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+ |
|
60 |
+ |
|
61 |
+====Turn—campus hearings are a better place to debate. Delgado and Yun 94==== |
|
62 |
+Richard Delgado ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against Hate-Speech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd,"1994. |
|
63 |
+A further neoconservative objection is that silencing the racist through legislation might deprive the campus |
|
64 |
+AND |
|
65 |
+allowing racial confrontation to flourish, the argument appears to deserve little weight. |