Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[7]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[7]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-18 02:38:43.979
	1	+2016-12-18 02:38:43.0

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,112 @@
	1	+==K==
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====The notion of free speech assumes that all voices are equally treated, when in reality power inequities shape who can speak what Boler 2000====
	5	+Boler 2k Megan Boler (Professor in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and editor of Digital Media and Democracy), "All Speech is Not Free: The Ethics of "Affirmative Action Pedagogy," Philosophy of Education, 2000
	6	+All speech is not free. Power inequities institutionalized through economies, gender roles,
	7	+AND
	8	+in our classrooms, even at the minor cost of limiting dominant voices.
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====Free exchange of ideas is outweighed by need for direct action – anything else accepts racism, neoliberalism, and economic inequality as the norm====
	12	+Tillett-Saks 13 Andrew Tillett-Saks (organizer with UNITE HERE Local 217), "Neoliberal Myths," Counterpunch, 11/7/2013
	13	+The twofold argument against the protestors stems from two central myths of neoliberalism. The
	14	+AND
	15	+greater freedom. To the contrary, direct action has always proved necessary.
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Racism must be rejected in every instance without surcease. It justifies atrocities, and is truly the capital sin. Memmi 2000====
	19	+Memmi 2k – Albert, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ Unv. Of Paris, Albert (RACISM, translated by Steve Martinot, pp.163-165)
	20	+The struggle against racism will be long, difficult, without intermission, without remission
	21	+AND
	22	+. True, it is a wager, but the stakes are irresistible.
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====Colleges are key to challenging racism====
	26	+Gordon and Johnson 95 Jill Gordon (Charles A. Dana Professor of Philosophy, Colby College) and Markus Johnson, "Race, Speech, and a Hostile Educational Environment: What Color Is Free Speech?" Journal of Social Philosophy, 2003
	27	+From racially motivated police brutality to kindly condescension, racism and racialized behavior pervade American
	28	+AND
	29	+democracy itself
	30	+This turns case because the aff makes critical empowerment impossible.
	31	+
	32	+
	33	+==CP==
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+====CP Text: AFF actors will remove all restrictions on constitutionally protected free speech, and ban the usage of all hate speech, including hate speech not protected by the First Amendment.====
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+====Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims and reinforces structural inequities. Delgado 82:====
	40	+Delgado 82, Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918
	41	+In addition to the harms of immediate emotional distress and infringement of dignity, racial
	42	+AND
	43	+," the child will find it difficult not to accept those judgments.76
	44	+
	45	+
	46	+====Hate speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups perpetuating structural inequalities.====
	47	+**Greenblatt 15** Jonathan Greenblatt, When Hateful Speech Leads to Hate Crimes: Taking Bigotry Out of the Immigration Debate, Huffington Post, 8/21/15, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-greenblatt/when-hateful-speech-leads_b_8022966.html
	48	+When police arrived at the scene in Boston, they found a Latino man shaking
	49	+AND
	50	+are working with a broad coalition of partners to get the ball rolling.
	51	+
	52	+
	53	+====College Speech codes create an increase of free speech. Garrett 02====
	54	+Garrett 02 Deanna M. Garrett Deanna M. Garrett graduated from the University of Virginia in 1997 with a bachelor's degree in Religious Studies and a minor in Biology. She is a second-year HESA student and a Graduate Assistant in the Department of Residential Life. "Silenced Voices: Hate Speech Codes on Campus" University of Vermont July 29, 2002 http://www.uvm.edu/~~~~vtconn/?Page=v20/garrett.html
	55	+Advocates of hate speech codes contend that the inclusion of racist, sexist, and
	56	+AND
	57	+means that minorities will never be critically empowered because hate speech destroys them.
	58	+
	59	+
	60	+==Case:==
	61	+1. Cross-apply the DA, even if free speech theoretically empowers, in reality hate speech silences those who need to be empowered. Their voices will never be heard.
	62	+
	63	+
	64	+====Freedoms aren't applied equally – students of color aren't a part of your demonstrations because of distrust ====
	65	+Fang 16 (Marina, reporter @ the Huffington Post, "Most College Students Want Free Speech On Campuses — But Not When It's Hate Speech," 04/04/2016, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/free-speech-college-campuses-survey_us_5701c58ce4b0daf53aeff94e
	66	+The survey noted that race plays a particular role in college students' perceptions of First
	67	+AND
	68	+company to crack down on people who use the app to harass others.
	69	+
	70	+
	71	+====Free speech in the abstract allows for micro-aggressions that cause violence to students—they have zero control over whether or not that person will be held accountable. ====
	72	+Ellin 16 (Abby, reporter @ the NY Times, "Studies in the First Amendment, Playing Out on Campus," JUNE 22, 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/education/studies-in-the-first-amendment-playing-out-on-campus.html
	73	+The fracases have left colleges struggling to figure out how to help students and faculty
	74	+AND
	75	+see these Twitter campaigns where a person's reputation can be attacked very easily."
	76	+
	77	+
	78	+====No impact to the aff—most people think we already have free speech, nothing is going to change ====
	79	+Dwyer 16 (Liz, writes about race, parenting, and social justice for several national publications, "College Students Say Free Speech Has Its Limits," April 4, 2016, http://www.takepart.com/article/2016/04/04/college-students-free-speech-limits
	80	+Last fall, the football team at the University of Missouri went on strike to
	81	+AND
	82	+that 69 percent believe policies against slurs and intentionally offensive language are needed.
	83	+
	84	+
	85	+====First Amendment protections allow white people to commit acts of violence and promotes a bystander culture that is eerily reminiscent of times of slavery ====
	86	+Ross 16 (Lawrence, writer @ the root, "Blackface on College Campuses Isn't About Freedom of Speech; It's About White Supremacy," October 31, 2016, http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/10/blackface-on-halloween-isnt-about-freedom-of-speech-its-about-white-supremacy
	87	+It's Halloween, so put on your seat belts, brothers and sisters, and
	88	+AND
	89	+. And that's more troubling than the costume itself.
	90	+On Lipson:
	91	+
	92	+
	93	+====Vagueness concerns are overstated; creating clear rules for offensive speech is feasible Byrne 91:====
	94	+Byrne 91, J. Peter Byrne (Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center), Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University, 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991).
	95	+A central argument of this article has been that the university can be trusted to
	96	+AND
	97	+racial insults should not be troubled independently by vagueness.
	98	+On Strossen:
	99	+
	100	+
	101	+====Speech codes would deter behavior. Delgado and Yun 94====
	102	+Richard Delgado ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against Hate-Speech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd,"1994.
	103	+How should we see the bellwether argument? In one respect, the argument does
	104	+AND
	105	+-but this is a different argument from the bellwether one.6 2
	106	+
	107	+
	108	+====Turn—campus hearings are a better place to have these debates. The neg sees the same discursive result as aff except there is the possibility for punishment and means we still have dialogue with them. Delgado and Yun 94====
	109	+Richard Delgado ~~Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado~~ and David Yun ~~JD, University of Colorado~~, "The Neo-conservative Case Against Hate-Speech Regulation- Lively, D'souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd,"1994.
	110	+A further neoconservative objection is that silencing the racist through legislation might deprive the campus
	111	+AND
	112	+to instigate the "town hall" discussions the argument assumes are desirable.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-18 02:38:46.316

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Steve Knell

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood EB

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+7

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Santa Monica Evans Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NC-Free Speech K, Hate Speech PIC, Case Turns

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+CPS