| ... |
... |
@@ -1,96
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-===AC=== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====The standard is promotion of Mill's liberty.==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====Liberty is a pre-requisite and public actors have an obligation to respect it.==== |
| 8 |
|
-Mill: |
| 9 |
|
-John Stuart Mill, "On Liberty," 1859 |
| 10 |
|
-Each will receive its proper share, if each has that which more particularly concerns |
| 11 |
|
-AND |
| 12 |
|
-, legal and social, to do the action and stand the consequences. |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-====The risk of being wrong in violating liberty for a greater good far outweighs any potential negative consequences. Mill 2:==== |
| 16 |
|
-It would be a great misunderstanding of this doctrine to suppose AND a sentiment the opposite of admiration will follow. |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-====Deciding what is right for other people is a bad idea because you're probably wrong yourself meaning we must respect liberty. Mill 3:==== |
| 20 |
|
-But the strongest of all the arguments against the interference of the public with AND self-regarding concerns of individuals the public has no business to interfere. |
| 21 |
|
-Additionally prefer: |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
-====1. Liberty is a constitutive feature of morality. Ethical systems that do not maintain liberty as their starting point fail because they make impossible the concept of moral culpability. ==== |
| 25 |
|
-Uleman 10 ~~(Jennifer, Associate Professor of Philosophy at Purchase College) "An Introduction to Kant's Moral Philosophy", Cambridge University Press, 1/21/2010~~ |
| 26 |
|
-We can summarize these thoughts by noticing how they fit with Kant's helpful AND as Kant understands it. Together, they make Kantian sense of the possibility of a free will. |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
-====2. All humans are entitled to their own conception of the good life. Respect for the equality of persons commits us to a system of negative rights wherein it is impossible to impose one's will coercively upon another. ==== |
| 29 |
|
-Fried 05 –gender modified ~~(Charles, Beneficial Professor of Law @ Harvard University) "The Nature and Importance of Liberty", Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2005~~ |
| 30 |
|
-I would say that what is important about us, what makes us moral AND has not chosen voluntarily to enlist in that campaign. |
| 31 |
|
- |
| 32 |
|
- |
| 33 |
|
-====3. Argumentation ethics necessarily leads to the rights of self-ownership and property acquisition. Kinsella==== |
| 34 |
|
-Stephan Kinsella, Friday, May 27, 2011, Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide |
| 35 |
|
-In essence, Hoppe's view is that argumentation, or discourse, is by its |
| 36 |
|
-AND |
| 37 |
|
-goods must be assumed to exist. (TSC, p. 161) |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
- |
| 40 |
|
-====4. Liberty provides the necessary framework for action and exercise of reason, making it a starting point for ethics and a prerequisite to answering other ethical questions. Boaz:==== |
| 41 |
|
-David Boaz (Executive vice president, Cato Institute). "Libertarianism: A Primer." Simon and Schuster. pp 61-62. 1997. |
| 42 |
|
-Any theory of rights has to begin somewhere. Most libertarian philosophers would begin the |
| 43 |
|
-AND |
| 44 |
|
-simple declaration: Natural rights are self-evident. |
| 45 |
|
- |
| 46 |
|
-====First, removing restrictions prevents prohibiting speech which is an essential liberty, no matter how miniscule the restrictions are. ==== |
| 47 |
|
-Lambert 16 (Saber, writer @ being libertarian, "The Degradation of Free Speech and Personal Liberty," April 9, 2016, https://beinglibertarian.com/the-degradation-of-free-speech-and-personal-liberty |
| 48 |
|
-Many individuals in society claim that they live in a free nation full of individual |
| 49 |
|
-AND |
| 50 |
|
-is often paralleled to a form of dictatorship – no matter how miniscule. |
| 51 |
|
- |
| 52 |
|
- |
| 53 |
|
-====Second, Arguments aren't harmful in-and-of themselves. The burden of rejoinder is necessary for dialogue to occur, and there's always a risk something offensive could be said, which proves that dialogue and limits on speech are zero sum. ==== |
| 54 |
|
-Anderson 06 — Amanda Anderson, Caroline Donovan Professor of English Literature and Department Chair at Johns Hopkins University, Senior Fellow at the School of Criticism and Theory at Cornell University, holds a Ph.D. in English from Cornell University, 2006 ("Reply to My Critic(s)," Criticism, Volume 48, Number 2, Spring, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via Project MUSE, p. 289) |
| 55 |
|
-Probyn's piece is a mixture of affective fallacy, argument by authority, and bald |
| 56 |
|
-AND |
| 57 |
|
-of ideas, that your claim to injury somehow damns your opponent's ideas. |
| 58 |
|
- |
| 59 |
|
- |
| 60 |
|
-====Third, a restriction on free speech imposes a view of the good that might well be wrong. Mill 4:==== |
| 61 |
|
-John Stuart Mill, "On Liberty," 1859 |
| 62 |
|
-First: the opinion which it is attempted to suppress by authority may possibly be |
| 63 |
|
-AND |
| 64 |
|
-it is that many, once general, are rejected by the present. |
| 65 |
|
- |
| 66 |
|
- |
| 67 |
|
-===Underview:=== |
| 68 |
|
- |
| 69 |
|
- |
| 70 |
|
-====Freedom of speech is necessary for the pursuit of moral truth.==== |
| 71 |
|
-D.V. Mill 16: |
| 72 |
|
-David Van Mill, Professor Political Science and International Relations, University of Western Australia, "Freedom of Speech," Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/~~#JohStuMilHarPri, July 12, 2016 |
| 73 |
|
-Given that Mill presented one of the first, and still perhaps the most famous |
| 74 |
|
-AND |
| 75 |
|
-to show that harm can be caused and that rights can be violated. |
| 76 |
|
- |
| 77 |
|
- |
| 78 |
|
-====Under any framework, the potential for fallibility means we need freedom of speech. Mill 5:==== |
| 79 |
|
-John Stuart Mill, "On Liberty," 1859 |
| 80 |
|
-In the present age—which has been described as "destitute of faith, |
| 81 |
|
-AND |
| 82 |
|
-towards those who dissent from them, or from their received interpretation.3 |
| 83 |
|
- |
| 84 |
|
- |
| 85 |
|
-====Freedom of expression is fundamental to the goals of universities. Fleischer 93:==== |
| 86 |
|
-Stephen Fleischer, ~~JD, University of Iowa~~ "Campus Speech Codes: The Threat to Liberal Education," John Marshall Law Review, 1993. |
| 87 |
|
-Freedom of expression facilitates the university's mission: to advance knowledge and encourage a search |
| 88 |
|
-AND |
| 89 |
|
-of tongues, ~~rather~~ than through any kind of authoritative selection." |
| 90 |
|
- |
| 91 |
|
- |
| 92 |
|
-====Frameworks that put an emphasis on criticism liberation or emancipation from violence are self defeating Hägglund 08'==== |
| 93 |
|
-Martin Hägglund: Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press, Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics, 2008. |
| 94 |
|
-Emancipatory politics does not aspire to a telos of absolute liberation, but must always |
| 95 |
|
-AND |
| 96 |
|
-violence (since it may be negated by the coming of other futures)." |