| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation: If the affirmative defends more than country as the actor, there must be clear delineations which territories belong to which countries. To clarify, individual countries must already have possession and jurisdiction of specific territories the plan is being enacted on. Err toward spirit of the interp – abuse is contextualized by the standards and otherwise you permit abuse to occur based on blippy semantic I meets. |
|
2 |
+Violation: |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====The aff prohibits nuclear production in space, but no country controls specific territories in space.==== |
|
5 |
+**Simberg 12** |
|
6 |
+(Simberg, Rand. "Property Rights in Space." The New Atlantis Fall 2012. http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/property-rights-in-space). |
|
7 |
+Despite the progress in technology, and the appeal of valuable resources, space settlement |
|
8 |
+AND |
|
9 |
+age — partly explains why we have not yet developed that final frontier. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Standards |
|
12 |
+Quality of ground. |
|
13 |
+Real world education. |
|
14 |
+Utopian fiat. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Voters |