Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[33]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[33]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,33 +1,0 @@
1		-====Interpretation: On the November December 2016 NSDA LD topic, the affirmative must defend the implementation of a United States government policy that defends limiting qualified immunity for police officers. The Lectic Law Library clarifies what qualified immunity is.====
2		-The Lectic Law Library. "Qualified Immunity." No date. http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/q063.htm
3		-The defense of qualified immunity protects "government officials
4		-AND
5		-constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."
6		-
7		-
8		-====And, "resolved" before a colon reflects a legislative forum.====
9		-**AOS 4** (5-12, "~~# 12, Punctuation – The Colon and Semicolon", http://usawocc.army.mil/IMI/wg12.htm)
10		-The colon introduces the following: a. A list, but only after "
11		-AND
12		-Resolved: (colon) That this council petition the mayor.
13		-
14		-Violation
15		-Standards
16		-1. Ground.
17		-2. Limits.
18		-**Harris 10**
19		-Harris, Scott ~~Debate coach for over 25 years, coaches University of Kansas Policy Debate Team~~, " This ballot," Published on CEDADebate.org Forums. 5/5/13. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?topic=4762.msg10246.
20		-Debates about what kinds of arguments we should or should not be making in debates are not insignificant either. The limits debate is an argument that has real pragmatic consequences. I found myself earlier this year judging Harvard's eco-pedagogy aff and thought to myself—I could stay up tonight
21		-AND
22		-will have little to no effect on the teams that refuse to debate the topic.
23		-
24		-3. Topic education.
25		-4. Deliberation skills.
26		-
27		-Voters.
28		-
29		-====Fairness is a prerequisite to any form of discussion – turns all your K impacts. ====
30		-Galloway 7
31		-Debate as a dialogue sets an argumentative table, where ~~allows~~ all parties
32		-AND
33		-substitutes for topical action do not accrue the dialogical benefits of topical advocacy.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-14 19:45:43.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Ivens-Duran, Miyamoto, Scoggin

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-North Hollywood JS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-20

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Doubles

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-San Marino Wu Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2 - Topicality

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Damus