| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,37 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Any possibility of progress through the rule of law invests in a myth. The law is not neutral but inherently political; acceptance of the rule of law makes you complicit in the state's oppression.==== |
|
2 |
+Hasnas 95: |
|
3 |
+John Hasnas (associate professor, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University). "The Myth of the Rule of Law." Wisconsin Law Review. 1995. http://faculty.msb.edu/hasnasj/GTWebSite/MythWeb.htm |
|
4 |
+In his novel 1984, George Orwell created a nightmare vision of the future in |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+free society requires the abandonment of the myth of the rule of law. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====Objectivity within the law is impossible; the idea that we can ever reach a sound conclusion based on the law alone is wishful thinking==== |
|
10 |
+Hasnas 95: |
|
11 |
+John Hasnas (associate professor, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University). "The Myth of the Rule of Law." Wisconsin Law Review. 1995. http://faculty.msb.edu/hasnasj/GTWebSite/MythWeb.htm |
|
12 |
+What Professor Kingsfield knows is that the legal world is not like the real world |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+is the ultimate form of unfairness because debater's do not control the outcome. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====They posit the Supreme Court as objective judicial power, but historical Court reliance on "tradition" is a dogwhistle for ensuring social immobility under the constitution– the aff is a ruse of solvency. Hunter 14: ==== |
|
18 |
+~~{Rob Hunter (PhD in political science from Princeton University). "Waiting for SCOTUS." Jacobin Mag. LEFC June 2014~~} |
|
19 |
+From the liberal perspective, juristocracy is an aberration rather than the norm. In |
|
20 |
+AND |
|
21 |
+is reductively rendered in constitutional text, rather than manifested in political practice. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+====Ignoring the rule of law's violent underside fuels Western imperialism and the violence that comes with it==== |
|
25 |
+Dossa 99 |
|
26 |
+Shiraz, Department of Political Science, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, "Liberal Legalism: Law, Culture and Identity," The European Legacy, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 73-87,1 |
|
27 |
+Law's imperial reach, it massive authority, in liberal politics is a brute, |
|
28 |
+AND |
|
29 |
+in last two centuries in articulating a dismissive image of the native Other. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====The alternate is embracing law's indeterminacy. The rule of law only has coercive power when people think it objectively protects them. Objective law is a paradox with subjective application. ==== |
|
33 |
+Hasnas 95 |
|
34 |
+John Hasnas (associate professor, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University). "The Myth of the Rule of Law." Wisconsin Law Review. 1995. http://faculty.msb.edu/hasnasj/GTWebSite/MythWeb.htm |
|
35 |
+Let us assume that I have failed to convince you of the impossibility of reforming |
|
36 |
+AND |
|
37 |
+politics in which judicial interference with democracy is not only unnecessary but unthinkable. |